QuickSwap [Old] 價格QUICK

The US government’s stance on Bitcoin as a potential strategic reserve is under scrutiny following recent statements from Crypto Czar David Sacks. His remarks at a press conference and on social media have fueled speculation that the administration might be reconsidering its $BTC Reserve plan. Meanwhile, debates among crypto communities are intensifying, with some arguing that the focus may now be on broader digital assets rather than just Bitcoin. David Sacks Spark Uncertainty Over US Bitcoin Strategic Reserve During a recent press conference, David Sacks addressed the administration’s plans for digital assets, highlighting President Trump’s directive to explore the feasibility of a Bitcoin reserve. At the same time, this acknowledgment initially excited investors, but Sacks’ cautious language raised concerns. He stated that the administration would “evaluate” the idea of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, emphasizing that the feasibility study was among their first priorities. This phrasing led many market watchers to believe that the government is not fully committed to Bitcoin as a reserve asset but is merely assessing its viability. Meanwhile, financial market expert Jim Bianco was quick to point out the shift in tone, stating that Washington often uses terms like “evaluate” when they do not intend to take action. He noted that Trump had previously suggested a Bitcoin reserve, not just an evaluation, leading to speculation that the plan might be stalling. Pro-XRP Lawyer Weighs In Amid Bitcoin Vs Digital Asset Debate Adding to the uncertainty, David Sacks’ recent post on X detailed his discussions with lawmakers about supporting digital assets. Notably, Bitcoin was mentioned only once, while “digital assets” was referenced multiple times. This has sparked debates over whether the administration is shifting from a Bitcoin-exclusive focus to a broader digital asset reserve. Renowned pro-XRP lawyer Fred Rispoli weighed in, suggesting that the administration’s repeated mention of “digital assets” could indicate that Bitcoin will not be the sole focus. He speculated that multiple cryptocurrencies might be included in any potential reserve, though specific mentions of $XRP or other tokens were absent. Bitcoin Dips Amid Ongoing Uncertainty $BTC price today recorded a sharp decline following David Sacks’s comment, with it currently trading at $97,872. The crypto’s one-day trading volume also plunged 20% to $66 billion. Notably, BTC has touched a low of $96,208 and a high of $100,807 in the last 24 hours. Notably, many traders had anticipated a more definitive stance on Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, and the ambiguity in Sacks’ statement contributed to uncertainty. The debate has also fueled tensions between Bitcoin maximalists and the XRP community previously, with both sides arguing over which digital assets should be included in any future US reserve plan. While some believe Bitcoin remains the frontrunner, others argue that a diversified digital asset reserve could be more beneficial. On the other hand, President Donald Trump’s past remarks on crypto have played a crucial role in shaping expectations. He has suggested that the US might explore a “US Crypto Reserve,” but without explicitly endorsing Bitcoin. This ambiguity leaves room for multiple interpretations, with investors now keeping a close track of the US Bitcoin Reserve possibilities.

The US government’s stance on Bitcoin as a potential strategic reserve is under scrutiny following recent statements from Crypto Czar David Sacks. His remarks at a press conference and on social media have fueled speculation that the administration might be reconsidering its $BTC Reserve plan. Meanwhile, debates among crypto communities are intensifying, with some arguing that the focus may now be on broader digital assets rather than just Bitcoin. David Sacks Spark Uncertainty Over US Bitcoin Strategic Reserve During a recent press conference, David Sacks addressed the administration’s plans for digital assets, highlighting President Trump’s directive to explore the feasibility of a Bitcoin reserve. At the same time, this acknowledgment initially excited investors, but Sacks’ cautious language raised concerns. He stated that the administration would “evaluate” the idea of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, emphasizing that the feasibility study was among their first priorities. This phrasing led many market watchers to believe that the government is not fully committed to Bitcoin as a reserve asset but is merely assessing its viability. Meanwhile, financial market expert Jim Bianco was quick to point out the shift in tone, stating that Washington often uses terms like “evaluate” when they do not intend to take action. He noted that Trump had previously suggested a Bitcoin reserve, not just an evaluation, leading to speculation that the plan might be stalling. Pro-XRP Lawyer Weighs In Amid Bitcoin Vs Digital Asset Debate Adding to the uncertainty, David Sacks’ recent post on X detailed his discussions with lawmakers about supporting digital assets. Notably, Bitcoin was mentioned only once, while “digital assets” was referenced multiple times. This has sparked debates over whether the administration is shifting from a Bitcoin-exclusive focus to a broader digital asset reserve. Renowned pro-XRP lawyer Fred Rispoli weighed in, suggesting that the administration’s repeated mention of “digital assets” could indicate that Bitcoin will not be the sole focus. He speculated that multiple cryptocurrencies might be included in any potential reserve, though specific mentions of $XRP or other tokens were absent. Bitcoin Dips Amid Ongoing Uncertainty $BTC price today recorded a sharp decline following David Sacks’s comment, with it currently trading at $97,872. The crypto’s one-day trading volume also plunged 20% to $66 billion. Notably, BTC has touched a low of $96,208 and a high of $100,807 in the last 24 hours. Notably, many traders had anticipated a more definitive stance on Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, and the ambiguity in Sacks’ statement contributed to uncertainty. The debate has also fueled tensions between Bitcoin maximalists and the XRP community previously, with both sides arguing over which digital assets should be included in any future US reserve plan. While some believe Bitcoin remains the frontrunner, others argue that a diversified digital asset reserve could be more beneficial. On the other hand, President Donald Trump’s past remarks on crypto have played a crucial role in shaping expectations. He has suggested that the US might explore a “US Crypto Reserve,” but without explicitly endorsing Bitcoin. This ambiguity leaves room for multiple interpretations, with investors now keeping a close track of the US Bitcoin Reserve possibilities.

The US government’s stance on Bitcoin as a potential strategic reserve is under scrutiny following recent statements from Crypto Czar David Sacks. His remarks at a press conference and on social media have fueled speculation that the administration might be reconsidering its $BTC Reserve plan. Meanwhile, debates among crypto communities are intensifying, with some arguing that the focus may now be on broader digital assets rather than just Bitcoin. David Sacks Spark Uncertainty Over US Bitcoin Strategic Reserve During a recent press conference, David Sacks addressed the administration’s plans for digital assets, highlighting President Trump’s directive to explore the feasibility of a Bitcoin reserve. At the same time, this acknowledgment initially excited investors, but Sacks’ cautious language raised concerns. He stated that the administration would “evaluate” the idea of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, emphasizing that the feasibility study was among their first priorities. This phrasing led many market watchers to believe that the government is not fully committed to Bitcoin as a reserve asset but is merely assessing its viability. Meanwhile, financial market expert Jim Bianco was quick to point out the shift in tone, stating that Washington often uses terms like “evaluate” when they do not intend to take action. He noted that Trump had previously suggested a Bitcoin reserve, not just an evaluation, leading to speculation that the plan might be stalling. Pro-XRP Lawyer Weighs In Amid Bitcoin Vs Digital Asset Debate Adding to the uncertainty, David Sacks’ recent post on X detailed his discussions with lawmakers about supporting digital assets. Notably, Bitcoin was mentioned only once, while “digital assets” was referenced multiple times. This has sparked debates over whether the administration is shifting from a Bitcoin-exclusive focus to a broader digital asset reserve. Renowned pro-XRP lawyer Fred Rispoli weighed in, suggesting that the administration’s repeated mention of “digital assets” could indicate that Bitcoin will not be the sole focus. He speculated that multiple cryptocurrencies might be included in any potential reserve, though specific mentions of $XRP or other tokens were absent. Bitcoin Dips Amid Ongoing Uncertainty $BTC price today recorded a sharp decline following David Sacks’s comment, with it currently trading at $97,872. The crypto’s one-day trading volume also plunged 20% to $66 billion. Notably, BTC has touched a low of $96,208 and a high of $100,807 in the last 24 hours. Notably, many traders had anticipated a more definitive stance on Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, and the ambiguity in Sacks’ statement contributed to uncertainty. The debate has also fueled tensions between Bitcoin maximalists and the XRP community previously, with both sides arguing over which digital assets should be included in any future US reserve plan. While some believe Bitcoin remains the frontrunner, others argue that a diversified digital asset reserve could be more beneficial. On the other hand, President Donald Trump’s past remarks on crypto have played a crucial role in shaping expectations. He has suggested that the US might explore a “US Crypto Reserve,” but without explicitly endorsing Bitcoin. This ambiguity leaves room for multiple interpretations, with investors now keeping a close track of the US Bitcoin Reserve possibilities.

This is a good, enthusiastic post about $OM and Real World Assets (RWAs). Here are some of its strengths and areas for potential improvement: Strengths: * Enthusiastic and Engaging Tone: The use of emojis, questions, and phrases like "Crypto fam!" and "moon mission" creates excitement and grabs the reader's attention. * Clear Explanation of RWAs: The post concisely explains what RWAs are and why they are attracting interest, making it accessible to those who might be unfamiliar with the concept. * Focus on $OM: The post clearly highlights $OM as a potential leader in the RWA space and explains the reasons for this belief (price action, potential accumulation phase). * Call to Action: The post encourages readers to stay informed, do their own research (DYOR), and be aware of the potential opportunities and risks. * Disclaimer: Including a disclaimer is crucial and shows responsibility. * Use of Hashtags: Including hashtags like #OM and $OM increases visibility on social media. Areas for Potential Improvement: * Provide More Specific Information about $OM: While the post mentions price and accumulation, it lacks details about what $OM is. What problem does it solve? What technology does it use? What is its market capitalization? Linking to the project's website or whitepaper would be beneficial. Saying it's an "RWA champion" is a claim that needs backing up. How is it a champion? * Expand on the "Accumulation Phase" Argument: Simply stating that whales are accumulating isn't very convincing. Providing some evidence, even anecdotal (e.g., on-chain data analysis, large buy orders), would strengthen this claim. Be cautious about language like "moon mission" as it can come across as promoting speculation. * Address Potential Risks More Directly: While the disclaimer is important, the post could benefit from briefly mentioning some of the specific risks associated with investing in $OM or RWAs in general (e.g., regulatory uncertainty, market volatility, project-specific risks). "Always do your own research" is good advice, but a quick mention of potential downsides would add balance. * Avoid Overly Hype-Driven Language: While enthusiasm is good, phrases like "token to watch" and "biggest beneficiaries" can sound overly promotional. A more balanced approach would enhance credibility. Focus on the facts and let the reader draw their own conclusions. * Consider Adding a TL;DR: A "Too Long; Didn't Read" summary at the beginning or end could be helpful for busy readers. Suggestions for Revision: * Start with a concise TL;DR: "TL;DR: $OM is showing promising signs in the growing Real World Asset (RWA) space. Potential accumulation phase and strong price action suggest it's a token to watch, but DYOR!" * Provide context about $OM: Briefly explain the project, its purpose, and its technology. Link to relevant resources. * Strengthen the accumulation argument: If possible, provide some evidence or context. If not, dial back the certainty. * Add a brief section on risks: "Potential risks include..." * Moderate the hype: Focus on factual information and let the reader decide. * Conclude with a strong call to action: "DYOR and stay informed about the exciting developments in the RWA space!" By incorporating these suggestions, you can create a more informative and balanced post that will resonate with a wider audience.

Nothing changed yet on $ONDO , it has swept the internal liquidity of daily FVG by a quick wick during the dump. A positive point is that it pumped quickly from FVG. And now it's trading above the marked key level. As it remains above that marked key Zone then it's time to fly. So keep your holdings strong. We can also retest that key level, that's why keep some Funds for DCA.