Giá Act I : The AI ProphecyACT

Cardano, one of the blockchain space’s titans, is stirring up quite the conversation with a significant proposal from its founder, Charles Hoskinson. The idea on the table? To convert a substantial 140 million ADA (roughly $100 million USD) from the Cardano treasury into a mix of Bitcoin (BTC) and Cardano’s native stablecoins, like USDM, USDA, and IUSD. My immediate thought is this: it’s a strategic maneuver aimed squarely at bolstering Cardano’s decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem, which Hoskinson believes is currently underserved in terms of stablecoin liquidity. And frankly, I tend to agree with his assessment here. The core argument for this move, as I see it, is to inject much-needed stablecoin capital into the Cardano DeFi landscape. Stablecoins are the lifeblood of DeFi — they provide a less volatile medium for transactions, lending, and borrowing, fostering a more robust and attractive environment for developers and users. Hoskinson has been quite vocal, stating that Cardano’s current stablecoin situation is “killing” its DeFi growth, especially when you compare its stablecoin representation in total value locked (TVL) to other major blockchains. From my perspective, he’s not wrong; you can’t build a thriving financial ecosystem without stable, reliable pegs. THE VISION, AS I UNDERSTAND IT: 🔹 BOOSTING STABLECOIN LIQUIDITY: This is paramount. By directly purchasing and integrating stablecoins, Cardano aims to increase their availability on the network, making it easier for users to engage in DeFi activities without constant exposure to ADA’s inherent price fluctuations. This is a clear win in my book for usability. 🔹 ATTRACTING MORE DEVELOPERS AND USERS: It stands to reason that a more liquid and stable DeFi environment will entice new projects and users to build and participate on Cardano. For me, this is a no-brainer for driving overall ecosystem growth. 🔹 PRIMING BITCOIN DEFI: Including Bitcoin in the treasury diversification could also be a subtle but potent strategic play to facilitate future Bitcoin-related DeFi initiatives on Cardano. Leveraging Bitcoin’s status as the king of crypto is a smart move. 🔹 GENERATING NON-INFLATIONARY REVENUE: The idea here is also to potentially generate yield from these diversified assets, creating a sustainable funding mechanism for future development without simply minting more ADA. This speaks to sound financial planning, something I always appreciate in a blockchain project. THE COMMUNITY’S CONCERNS: A BALANCING ACT, FROM MY VIEWPOINT However, this proposal hasn’t been met with universal enthusiasm, and I completely understand why. As the article highlights, “there are many doubts within the community”, and the primary concern, for me as well, revolves around the potential impact of selling $100 million worth of ADA on its price. While Hoskinson assures that the ADA market is deep enough to absorb such a sale over a 30–90 day period through over-the-counter (OTC) deals and time-weighted average prices (TWAPs) without significant price movement, I can’t help but feel a pang of caution. A sudden or poorly executed sale could lead to downward price pressure on ADA, impacting current holders and potentially creating negative sentiment. It’s a risk that needs careful mitigation. Another point of discussion, and one I think is crucial, is governance. While Hoskinson has outlined the plan, the community, myself included, will absolutely want to see transparent governance structures for managing this “sovereign wealth fund” and ensuring its strategic deployment. Trust is built on transparency, especially when dealing with such significant sums. LONG-TERM VALUE OF ADA: A CALCULATED RISK, IN MY OPINION? So, what impact will this move have on the long-term value of ADA? My honest answer is that it’s a calculated risk with both significant potential upsides and, yes, some noticeable downsides. POTENTIAL UPSIDES (WHAT I HOPE TO SEE): 🔹 ENHANCED UTILITY AND ADOPTION: If this strategy is successful, a thriving DeFi ecosystem on Cardano could significantly increase the utility and demand for ADA, as it remains the native token for transaction fees and staking. More utility, in my experience, almost always translates to long-term value appreciation. 🔹 STRENGTHENED ECOSYSTEM: A robust and competitive DeFi landscape makes Cardano a far more attractive platform overall, which could lead to greater network effects and continued innovation. This is the kind of organic growth that truly sustains a project. 🔹 IMPROVED COMPETITIVENESS: By addressing its stablecoin “problem”, Cardano aims to close the gap with other leading smart contract platforms that boast more mature DeFi ecosystems. I believe this move is essential for Cardano to remain a top contender. POTENTIAL DOWNSIDES (MY CONCERNS): 🔹 SHORT-TERM PRICE VOLATILITY: Despite Hoskinson’s assurances, the sheer volume of ADA being sold could create some short-term price volatility. While it might be a temporary blip, it’s enough to deter new investors, and that’s something to be mindful of. 🔹 COMMUNITY DISCONTENT: This is a big one for me. If the community feels its concerns are not adequately addressed or if the execution is perceived as mismanaged, it could lead to fragmentation and reduced confidence. A project’s strength lies in its community. 🔹 EXECUTION RISK: The success of this strategy hinges on the effective and transparent management of the converted funds, including how they are deployed into yield-generating instruments and managed by a potential elected board. Poor execution could undo even the best intentions. MY CONCLUSION: Cardano’s proposal to sell $100 million of ADA from its treasury to fuel DeFi growth is, in my view, a bold and incredibly strategic move. It speaks to a proactive approach to addressing a critical bottleneck in its ecosystem. While I share some of the community’s concerns about immediate price impact, my personal conviction is that the long-term vision of a more liquid, robust, and competitive Cardano DeFi environment could ultimately pave the way for greater utility and demand for ADA. The coming months will be crucial in observing how this proposal is refined, implemented, and ultimately received by the broader crypto market. As I always say in the dynamic world of crypto, the community’s engagement and careful execution will be absolutely key to unlocking the potential long-term benefits for ADA. $ADA

RT @laurashin: 💥 ICMYI: There's a hiccup in negotiations over the House crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act. tl;dr Republicans a…

I'm not saying people are perfect, we all have our failings and mistakes But to accept that everyone is born a "worthless sinner" and to feel guilt for this perspective your whole life? That is wrong, and not Love - in my opinion This is not an excuse to act poorly, of course

RT @pyrrhfect7: I 100% understand why men act broke to see who really fw them..

From Meme to Meaning: OSF’s Vision for Web4 OSF introduces a novel framework for understanding where digital assets—and the communities that form around them—might be heading. He describes a shift beyond the current crypto paradigm into something he calls Web4, where the central innovation is the emergence of brand coins: tokens that serve not as vehicles for capital formation or traditional utility, but as market-based reflections of sentiment, loyalty, and cultural gravity. At the heart of OSF’s argument is the idea that tokens can act as a real-time index for something long considered intangible: goodwill. In traditional corporate finance, goodwill typically appears on a balance sheet during an acquisition, capturing the excess value attributed to brand reputation, customer relationships, or market position. OSF flips this concept on its head by asking: what if that brand-driven value could be created first, by a community, and then traded openly—without requiring a corporate event to make it visible? Brilliant! A brand coin, in this context, is a token whose value is not derived from traditional cash flows or governance rights, but from how the market perceives the cultural relevance and momentum of the brand it’s associated with. Its pricing becomes a live expression of belief, sentiment, and collective attention—something OSF likens to a form of “liquid goodwill.” Also, brilliant! 🧪 OSF notes that Web3 emphasizes decentralized ownership of digital assets, while Web4 presents a decentralized continuation of that value via communities. This is a model wherein anyone can create a token around an idea, a character, a brand, or a moment—and its value is determined not by its technical function, but by its emotional and narrative resonance with a community. OSF characterizes this as “social money”—a token that captures sentiment as a store of value, and attention as a form of capital. The token becomes a kind of mirror, constantly updating based on how visible, beloved, or talked-about the brand is. This isn’t financial value in the legacy sense—it’s “cultural liquidity.” OSF’s post proposes a new paradigm: What if the next evolution of digital assets isn’t about features or functionality, but about turning narrative, belief, and identity into tradable primitives? What if goodwill, previously confined to the back pages of M&A spreadsheets, could become a publicly traded, community-driven metric of brand strength? Web4 branded culture coins may well be the start of new revolutionary operating system for gauging memetic culture & reach. Great piece, OSF. Stay Rekt @rektdrinks