Act I : The AI Prophecy PriceACT

California's crypto regulator faces funding shortage The U.S. state of California regulator responsible for overseeing California's cryptocurrency licensing law will need additional funds to launch the project before the scheduled implementation date of July 1, 2026. The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation expects to face a $193 million funding gap to set up several projects, including the Digital Financial Assets Act. The bill, which will be introduced in 2023, aims to establish a licensing framework for digital asset companies operating in the state. California is one of at least three states to establish a licensing system for the trillion-dollar industry, aimed at increasing oversight of consumers and investors and preventing fraud. Meanwhile, the U.S. Senate is trying to pass legislation that would provide a regulatory framework for the industry.

RT @kyle_chasse: 🇺🇸SENATOR LUMMIS SAYS THE GENIUS ACT AND THE STABLECOIN BILL WILL BE PASSED NEXT WEEK. AND SOME PEOPLE STILL THINK CRYPTO…

stop trying to make the pivotal act happen it is never going to happen (also, if you want to work for Anthropic in 2025 you automatically cross over to the wrong side of the friend/food distinction in my book)

The future of the cryptocurrency industry in the United States hinges significantly on regulatory clarity. For years, stakeholders have called for clear guidelines to foster innovation while protecting consumers and markets. A crucial moment in this ongoing effort is fast approaching, as the U.S. House of Representatives prepares to review key legislation addressing US crypto regulation. At the center of the upcoming discussion is the CLARITY Act. This proposed bill is designed to bring much-needed structure to the nascent digital asset market by defining clear rules for participants. According to Eleanor Terrett, host of Crypto in America, the U.S. House is scheduled to hold a markup for the CLARITY Act on June 10th. So, what exactly does defining digital asset rules entail? Currently, the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies in the U.S. is fragmented, with different agencies like the SEC and CFTC asserting jurisdiction over various aspects of the market. The CLARITY Act aims to reduce this ambiguity, potentially specifying which assets fall under which regulatory frameworks and outlining requirements for exchanges, custodians, and other market participants. The goal is to provide a predictable environment for businesses and investors. The scheduled markup on June 10th is a significant step in the legislative process. A committee markup is where a congressional committee reviews the text of a bill in detail. Members can propose amendments, debate the bill’s provisions, and ultimately vote on whether to send the bill to the full House floor for consideration. This stage allows for fine-tuning and incorporating feedback, though it can also introduce significant changes or even stall the bill’s progress. For the crypto industry, the June 10th markup is a critical opportunity to see how the CLARITY Act is shaped and whether key industry concerns are addressed. The outcome will heavily influence the trajectory of crypto legislation US lawmakers pursue in the near future. While the CLARITY Act seeks to establish broad digital asset rules, a major point of contention and discussion revolves around decentralized finance (DeFi). DeFi platforms operate without traditional intermediaries, posing unique challenges for regulators seeking to apply existing frameworks. Crypto advocacy groups are actively lobbying to ensure that any new legislation, including the CLARITY Act, provides carve-outs or clear guidelines for DeFi that do not stifle innovation. A key proposal being pushed by these groups is the inclusion of protections based on the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA). The BRCA aims to clarify that entities that do not custody customer funds or control decentralized networks (like certain software developers or non-custodial wallet providers) are not considered money transmitters or financial institutions under existing law. Including BRCA-like provisions within the CLARITY Act is seen as essential for protecting the growth and functionality of DeFi. Without such clarity, developers and participants in DeFi could face significant legal and regulatory risks. However, not everyone views the CLARITY Act without reservations. Some critics warn that the current draft or potential direction of the bill might inadvertently favor traditional financial institutions seeking to enter the crypto space, potentially creating barriers for native crypto businesses and protocols. Concerns exist that the rules might be too burdensome or ill-suited for the unique characteristics of decentralized technologies, potentially hindering competition and innovation within the crypto ecosystem itself. This debate highlights the challenge of writing effective US crypto regulation that balances oversight with fostering a new industry. Adding another layer of complexity to the regulatory picture is the political dimension. The approach to crypto legislation US lawmakers take is often influenced by party lines and broader political strategies. In a separate development, Democrats are reportedly planning a hearing to examine U.S. President Donald Trump’s alleged crypto ties. While seemingly distinct from the CLARITY Act markup, such hearings can influence the overall political climate surrounding crypto and potentially impact the appetite for bipartisan legislative action. Here’s a brief look at the key players and proposals in the current debate: As the June 10th markup approaches, stakeholders will be closely watching several key aspects: Staying informed about these developments is crucial for anyone involved in or interested in the crypto market. The outcome of this legislative process will have long-lasting effects on how the industry operates in the United States. The upcoming House markup of the CLARITY Act represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing effort to establish clear US crypto regulation. The debate surrounding the bill, particularly concerning the inclusion of protections for DeFi through proposals like the BRCA and concerns about the impact on native crypto businesses, highlights the complexities of regulating a rapidly evolving technology. As lawmakers grapple with defining digital asset rules, the industry watches eagerly, hoping for a framework that provides certainty without stifling the innovation that has defined the crypto space. The actions taken by the House on June 10th will provide significant insight into the potential future of crypto legislation US. To learn more about the latest US crypto regulation trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto legislation US policy . Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

$PCULE : Two Catalysts Pushing it Higher - This morning X announced @Polymarket as its official prediction partner. Recall $Pcule allows users to trade PolyMarket events - Additionally, @top_jeet_ announced a funding round from @alliancedao We think funding round should act as a strong signal for growth and product expansion, while also providing a valuation backstop. *Join our Research Alpha group, where we caught the launch of $Pcule. $274k —>$11m.