Uniswap Labs launches Unichain without unanimous consent from UNI token holders
On October 22nd, one of the largest holders of UNI tokens questioned the decentralization and behind-the-scenes transactions of Uniswap, particularly its claims of making a series of changes for "efficiency" reasons, and the potential undisclosed financial interests between Uniswap Labs and another blockchain called Optimism. Billy Gao, the governance lead of Stanford Blockchain Club (representing thousands of individuals who hold UNI governance tokens), posted a complaint containing 22 posts, which involves Uniswap's sudden decision to launch its own blockchain, canceling the proposed fee-switching mechanism that could benefit UNI holders, and bypassing the DAO that governs Uniswap on the surface.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
FTX bankruptcy managers accused of spending funds on luxury hotels, travel as creditors file legal action
FTX creditor calls for tighter review of extravagant $2,600 taxi spending by bankruptcy managers.
South Korea’s crypto market poised for change with new institutional guidelines
South Korea set to adjust laws, paving the way for crypto access in tune with global standards.
Bhutan’s Gelephu City Adopts Crypto for Strategic Reserves
By including highly liquid and secure digital assets, GMC aims to ensure that its reserves can be easily accessed and traded with minimal market impact.
South Korea Opens Doors for Companies to invest in Crypto