Traditional Polls vs. Prediction Markets: who’s winning 2024?
Supporters of prediction markets argue that these platforms quickly reflect real-time developments, allowing for faster updates on public sentiment.
As the 2024 presidential election approaches in the United States, a striking contrast has emerged between traditional polling methods and prediction markets regarding the race between Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris.
Currently, platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket indicate a significant lead for Donald Trump, with Kalshi assigning him a 55% probability of winning compared to 45% for Vice President Kamala Harris.
This contrasts sharply with national polls, which often show Harris slightly ahead, such as a recent New York Times tracker indicating a 50% to 47% lead for her.
Supporters of prediction markets argue that these platforms are more responsive to real-time developments, such as debates and breaking news, allowing for quicker updates on public sentiment.
Thomas Miller, a data science professor, asserts that political betting sites effectively aggregate the “wisdom of the crowd,” which could lead to more accurate forecasts. A Miller-run website that predicts the outcome of the Electoral College using PredictIt contract pricing currently projects Trump to win by a landslide.
However, skepticism persists regarding the reliability of these markets. Concerns about potential manipulation have arisen, especially following a surge in pro-Trump betting activity.
Some analysts have noted a series of significant bets favoring Donald Trump, particularly from an anonymous user on Polymarket. Additionally, Elon Musk’s posts on October 7 highlighted Trump’s advantage in prediction markets , potentially motivating other Trump supporters to place their bets. According to Election Betting Odds, a noticeable increase in Trump’s lead occurred around that time.
PredictIt has cautioned that its contract for a Trump victory is nearing the maximum trader limit, which could restrict further trading for bettors.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Trump imposes new sanctions on Iran, putting oil prices at even more risk
Share link:In this post: Trump sanctioned eight companies, one person, and one vessel over Iran’s defense tech supply. Oil prices dropped after the announcement, with Brent crude closing at $77.01. The US also sanctioned Houthi-linked networks moving oil and illicit goods.
$20 billion pulled from global equity funds in a week as Iran-Israel conflict worsens
Share link:In this post: Global equity funds saw $19.82 billion in outflows last week, the biggest in three months. US led the retreat with $18.43 billion pulled, while Europe gained $640 million. Bond and gold funds gained billions as investors fled risk amid the Iran-Israel war.
Trump says he regrets appointing Powell to the Fed in longest tirade to date
Share link:In this post: Trump said he regrets appointing Jerome Powell and called him a “moron” in his longest Fed rant yet. He demanded interest rates be cut to 1–2% and warned he might fire Powell before his term ends. Christopher Waller supports a July rate cut, but Tom Barkin and Mary Daly want to wait.
Former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky waive rights to bankruptcy distributions from the defunct firm
Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More
