Microsoft CEO calls OpenAI partnership ‘pro-competition’ amid UK, EU merger probes
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella gave pundits plenty to discuss during talks at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Jan. 16, but some of his most interesting comments may have come while speaking to reporters on the sidelines about OpenAI.
The Redmond company, under Nadella’s leadership, has invested at least $13 billion in OpenAI over the past few years and has recently taken a silent seat on the AI firm’s board.
This partnership has come under scrutiny in the United Kingdom and the European Union , with antitrust regulators from both weighing official merger probes.
As reported by Tech Xplore, Nadella recently spoke up on the subject while talking to reporters on the sidelines at Davos:
“If we want competition in AI against some of the players who are completely already integrated, I think partnerships is one avenue of, in fact, having competition.”
He went on to state that it was his assumption that regulators would question whether the partnership was good for competition, adding, “For me, it’s a no-brainer.”
Nadella also spoke out about Microsoft surpassing Apple recently to become the most valuable company in the world. He appeared undaunted by the company’s success and focused on the future.
Per a video posted on Bloomberg:
“So, the last thing you want to do is to fixate on the stock price, which we know means nothing in terms of what happens tomorrow.”
Microsoft’s ascension has been accompanied by record-high stock prices amid its successful partnership with ChatGPT and integration of new AI products and services.
The Redmond company has used GPT technology built in collaboration with OpenAI to develop its own suite of Copilot tools. Copilot features similar functionality to ChatGPT products and services while also providing optional support for Microsoft products such as Office and 365.
Related: Microsoft launches Copilot Pro with custom GPTs and Office integration
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Trump and Musk dine with Microsoft CEO to discuss AI, cybersecurity and American jobs
Share link:In this post: Microsoft Corp.’s Satya Nadella joins Donald Trump and Elon Musk for the discussion of AI and cybersecurity The statement said that the conversation was based on several topics, including the US firm’s pledge to invest $80 billion in AI data centers globally. Over $50 billion of that investment is expected to support American jobs.
Litecoin ETF may be near SEC approval after Canary Funds amends the filing
Share link:In this post: Canary Capital filed an amended S-1 registration statement for its Litecoin ETF on January 13. Senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg Eric Balchunas believes the SEC’s recent response to Canary’s Litecoin S-1, improves the chances that a Litecoin ETF will be approved soon. Canary Capital also filed its S-1 registration statement for Solana and XRP ETFs in October.
Arkansas legislators propose bill to prohibit crypto mining near military sites
Share link:In this post: Arkansas lawmakers introduced Senate Bill 60 (SB 60) to establish a 30-mile buffer zone around military facilities to limit cryptocurrency mining operations near sensitive sites. The bill was prompted by a crypto mining plant near Little Rock Air Force Base, raising concerns about noise pollution and environmental degradation. Similar actions have occurred elsewhere in the US, with federal and state officials addressing security risks and environmental concerns tied to crypto minin
Apple and Google remove Huione Group crypto apps after alleged $24 billion illicit marketplace operation
Share link:In this post: Apple and Google have removed apps developed by Huione Group from their marketplaces in response to fraud allegations. Huione Group is believed to be behind Huione Guarantee, a Telegram-based marketplace with about $24 billion in money laundering and other fraudulent activities. The removal of these apps raises questions about app stores’ responsibility in monitoring and preventing the distribution of apps linked to illegal activities.