US judge deals blow to artists in copyright suit over AI-generated art
Artists have been dealt a setback in their copyright fight against generative artificial intelligence (AI) firms after a class-action lawsuit against several of the firms was dismissed by a United States judge, citing a lack of evidence.
In an Oct. 30 order , California District Court Judge William Orrick said the copyright infringement suit against generative AI image service Midjourney, art platform DeviantArt and AI firm Stability AI was “defective in numerous respects,” granting earlier dismissal bids from the firms.
Judge Orrick, however, allowed a copyright infringement claim from one class action member against Stability to go ahead and allowed the class 30 days to attempt to submit an amended suit with more proof.
“Even Stability recognizes that determination of the truth of these allegations — whether copying in violation of the Copyright Act occurred in the context of training Stable Diffusion or occurs when Stable Diffusion is run — cannot be resolved at this juncture,” Orrick wrote.
Highlighted excerpt of Orrick’s conclusive order. Source: CourtListenerThe lawsuit was first filed in mid-January and claimed Stability’s AI model, Stable Diffusion, scraped billions of copyrighted images without permission — including those of the artists — to train the software.
DeviantArt also incorporated Stable Diffusion on its site, possibly copying millions of images from there without a license and violating its own terms of service, the suit alleged.
Related: Biden administration issues executive order for new AI safety standards
Orrick said the AI-generated images likely don’t infringe the artists’ copyright, as it’s “not plausible” they’re derived from copyrighted images. He added that he’s “not convinced” unless the class can show the generated images are similar to the artists’ work.
Copyright claims from some class members were dismissed, as their images weren’t registered with the Copyright Office, which is needed for bringing a copyright infringement suit.
Copyright infringement allegations are central to similar legal actions taken against AI firms, such as the Author’s Guild’s class action against OpenAI , Universal Music Group’s suit against Anthropic and Getty Images suits against Stability AI in the U.S. and United Kingdom.
Magazine: AI Eye: Real uses for AI in crypto, Google’s GPT-4 rival, AI edge for bad employees
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Tech giants bounce back after AI disruption, S&P 500 nears record high
Share link:In this post: Last week, the largest tech firms in the US experienced huge challenges from Chinese AI, DeepSeek. Apple and Meta reported positive results, boosting the S&P 500. The Magnificent Seven’s price-to-earnings ratio is now 31.
OpenAI launches o3-Mini as it fights back against DeepSeek
Share link:In this post: OpenAI has launched its o3-Mini AI model to fight back against DeepSeek’s latest model. The company mentioned in its blog post that the o3-Mini is the most cost-efficient model in their reasoning series. DeepSeek’s breakthrough caused a $1 trillion tech selloff while putting pressure on AI chip makers.
Crypto robbers face 76 years in prison for kidnapping and assault
Share link:In this post: A group of crypto robbers have been sentenced to jail for several counts of kidnap, theft, and assault. The robbers kidnapped the victim, tied him, and assaulted him before stealing his stash of cryptocurrency. Police investigation uncovered the illicit activities that the criminals were carrying out before their arrest.
Purpose Investments files for the first-ever Ripple (XRP) ETF in Canada