Orderly Network 價格ORDER

The Bitcoin community is divided: **Should BTC be a savings asset or a payment tool?** Let’s break it down with insights from key players. 💼 The Key Perspectives 1. Jack Dorsey (Payments Advocate) ➡️ "If Bitcoin is just a store of value… it fades into irrelevance." - Believes Bitcoin must be used in daily transactions to stay relevant. - Focused on Lightning Network adoption (via Block’s Bitkey wallet). 2. Michael Saylor (Store of Value Champion) ➡️ "Pay with dollars. Eat the pizza. Keep the Bitcoin." - Bitcoin = 21st-century gold (foundational money). - Fiat can circulate, but BTC is the ultimate settlement layer. 3. Lyn Alden (The Nuanced View) ➡️ "Bitcoin is both… but the order matters." - First, store of value (like gold’s historical path). - Then, medium of exchange as infrastructure matures. 4. David Marcus (Lightspark CEO) ➡️ "Real-time Bitcoin payments are already happening." - Stablecoins = tokenized fiat (still rely on Bitcoin’s security). - BTC is the neutral, global payment rail. ⚡ The Lightning Network Breakthrough - c= routing node earns 9.7% APR just by moving BTC liquidity. - No lending, no rehypothecation—pure Bitcoin utility. - Proof that Bitcoin can be both saved AND spent efficiently. 🔑 The Big Picture ✅ Bitcoin doesn’t need to choose—it’s solving two problems at once: - Store of value (for broken savings systems). - Medium of exchange (for broken payments). 🚀 It’s not a war—it’s evolution. - First, monetize as digital gold. - Then, scale payments via Lightning & L2s. 💥 The Counter-Narrative(For Balance) ❌ "Bitcoin is not money—it’s a digital collectible." - Fixed supply ≠ viable global currency (volatility issues). - Dorsey & Saylor’s views may be biased (Square vs. MicroStrategy incentives). 🌍 What’s Next? - BTC in DC (Sept 2025) – Shaping U.S. Bitcoin policy. - More adoption = more clarity on Bitcoin’s true role. 💬 Final Thought: Bitcoin is whatever the world needs it to be—savings asset, payment rail, or both. The debate isn’t binary… it’s just getting started. $BTC

The Trump administration seems to strongly support cryptocurrencies, especially Bitcoin, with policies like creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and promoting digital assets. Key actions include treating Bitcoin as a reserve asset, supporting stablecoins, and deregulating the crypto industry, aiming to make the U.S. a global leader in crypto. Positives include boosting innovation and market growth, with Bitcoin prices up 16% since January 2025, but there are concerns about conflicts of interest and potential corruption. Critics, mainly Democrats, argue these policies may benefit Trump personally, while supporters see them as forward-thinking; the topic is highly debated. Policies and Goals The Trump administration, as of May 2025, has embraced cryptocurrencies with policies like establishing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, treating Bitcoin as a reserve asset similar to gold, and creating a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile for seized crypto. They’ve also promoted dollar-backed stablecoins and prohibited Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), aiming to lead globally in digital finance. Goals include driving economic growth, providing regulatory clarity, and centralizing government crypto holdings for better security. Positives and Negatives Positives include fostering innovation, with Bitcoin reaching record highs (up 16% since January, 57% yearly), and resolving past mismanagement of seized crypto. Negatives include ethics concerns, as Trump’s personal crypto investments (e.g., meme coins) raise conflict-of-interest issues, with critics calling it potential corruption. Context and Reactions Politically, Democrats like Jamie Raskin and Elizabeth Warren criticize the policies as corrupt, while some Republicans support them. Economically, the market is bullish, with Truth Social raising $2.5 billion for a Bitcoin treasury. Reactions are mixed, with protesters opposing and industry leaders praising the moves. Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Trump Administration’s Cryptocurrency Policies (May 2025) This detailed analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the Trump administration’s cryptocurrency policies as of May 31, 2025, based on official documents, news reports, and expert analyses. It expands on the key points, offering a deeper look into actions, goals, impacts, and the broader context, including political reactions and market trends. Background and Policy Framework The Trump administration, inaugurated for its second term on January 20, 2025, has taken a markedly pro-crypto stance, contrasting with previous administrations’ more cautious approaches. This shift is evident in several executive actions and policy directives issued early in the term, reflecting a strategic embrace of digital assets as part of national economic policy. Key Actions and Implementation The administration’s cryptocurrency policies include a series of significant actions: Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile: On March 6, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order establishing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, treating Bitcoin as a reserve asset akin to gold, and the U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile to manage non-Bitcoin digital assets seized by the government . The Reserve is capitalized with forfeited Bitcoin from the Treasury, and agencies must account for their digital asset holdings to ensure centralized oversight. Support for Digital Assets and Blockchain: A January 23, 2025, presidential action, “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology,” supports the responsible growth of digital assets and blockchain technology across sectors . This includes protecting access to open public blockchain networks for lawful purposes, such as software development, mining, and self-custody. Promotion of Dollar-Backed Stablecoins: The administration aims to promote U.S. dollar sovereignty by encouraging the development and global use of lawful dollar-backed stablecoins, seen as a counter to foreign digital currencies. Prohibition of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): The policies explicitly prohibit CBDCs within U.S. jurisdiction, reflecting a preference for decentralized digital assets over government-issued currencies. Regulatory Clarity and Deregulation: Efforts include providing technology-neutral regulations and rescinding previous guidance, such as the Labor Department’s decision in May 2025 to rescind advice discouraging 401(k) plans from buying crypto Department of Labor Rescission, opening the door for greater crypto adoption in retirement accounts. Revocation of Previous Policies: Executive Order 14067 (March 9, 2022) and related frameworks were revoked to align with the current pro-crypto stance, ensuring consistency in policy direction. Appointment of a Crypto Czar and Engagement: A “crypto czar” was appointed, and the White House hosted its first-ever crypto summit, engaging with industry leaders to foster collaboration. The President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, established within the National Economic Council, includes officials from Treasury, Justice, Commerce, and other agencies, tasked with holding public hearings and consulting with digital asset leaders. Goals and Objectives The overarching goals of these policies are multifaceted: Global Leadership: Position the U.S. as the global leader in government digital asset strategy, fulfilling Trump’s campaign promise to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the world.” Centralization and Security: Centralize, secure, and maximize the value of government-held cryptocurrencies, addressing past issues like premature Bitcoin sales costing over $17 billion in taxpayer losses. Economic Growth and Innovation: Drive economic growth through the adoption of digital assets, recognizing Bitcoin’s scarcity and security as “digital gold” with a fixed supply of 21 million coins. Regulatory Clarity: Provide clear, technology-neutral regulations to foster innovation while protecting consumers and managing risks, with reports due within 180 days on regulatory frameworks for stablecoins and digital asset stockpiles. Dollar Sovereignty: Promote U.S. dollar-backed stablecoins to maintain global financial influence, countering the rise of foreign digital currencies. Positives and Benefits The policies have several positive aspects, as outlined in official documents and market analyses: Innovation and Leadership: By embracing cryptocurrencies, the U.S. is positioned at the forefront of global financial technology, attracting crypto businesses and fostering innovation. The administration’s open-minded approach is seen as forward-thinking by industry leaders. Security and Accountability: Centralizing government-held digital assets resolves past disjointed handling, ensuring better oversight and preventing losses from premature sales. Bitcoin’s security, never having been hacked, is highlighted as a strategic advantage. Market Growth: The market has responded positively, with Bitcoin reaching record highs, up 16% since January 2025 and 57% over the past year . Truth Social’s parent company announced plans to raise $2.5 billion to create a “Bitcoin treasury,” signaling strong investor confidence . Economic Benefits: Supporting digital assets is seen as a way to drive economic growth, with the Trump family backing bitcoin mining firms and launching a USD1 stablecoin, further integrating crypto into the economy. Resolution of Past Issues: The policies address previous lack of accountability in managing seized cryptocurrencies, ensuring cohesive and strategic management. Negatives and Challenges Despite the positives, there are significant concerns and challenges: Ethics and Conflict of Interest: Critics, including ethics experts like Timothy Massad (former CFTC chair), question whether the policies promote innovation or benefit Trump personally . Trump’s involvement with meme coins like $Trump and $Melania, launched in January 2025, and events like a private dinner for top $TRUMP buyers, raise conflict-of-interest concerns. A Washington Post analysis found Trump-affiliated businesses received $312 million from crypto sales and $43 million in fees through mid-May 2025, while small investors faced losses Washington Post Analysis. Potential for Corruption: Democrats like Jamie Raskin have called for investigations into Trump’s crypto ties, warning of foreign governments funneling money via anonymous crypto purchases and potential violations of the emoluments clause . Elizabeth Warren described the memecoin dinner as “an orgy of corruption” at a news conference. The State Democracy Defenders Fund estimated Trump’s crypto ventures are worth $2.9 billion, criticizing insufficient conflict-of-interest protections . Market Volatility and Risks: While the market is bullish, the rapid embrace of crypto could introduce risks, such as increased volatility or speculative bubbles, especially with small investors losing money in Trump’s meme coin ventures. Lack of Transparency: Critics argue that events like the memecoin dinner, where the 220 largest holders spent $148 million and the top 25 had a separate reception, directly benefit Trump family businesses without disclosure requirements, raising transparency concerns The Guardian: Trump Crypto Corruption. Political and Economic Context The political landscape surrounding these policies is highly polarized: Political Divide: Democrats, including lawmakers like Jeff Merkley, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, and Sean Casten, have introduced legislation to address potential conflicts, such as preventing presidents from owning significant digital assets and blocking Trump from benefiting crypto businesses . Republicans are more supportive, with Vice President JD Vance disclosing owning over $250,000 in Bitcoin and stating crypto is in a bull market under Trump . Ethics and Watchdog Concerns: Ethics watchdogs and watchdog groups have raised red flags over the Trump family’s crypto entanglements, with protesters at the memecoin dinner shouting “shame” and holding signs like “Don the Con” and “No Kings” . White House officials insist such events are “separate” and “unaffiliated,” but critics remain skeptical. Economic Trends: The crypto market has seen significant growth, with Bitcoin’s price surge reflecting market confidence in Trump’s policies. Truth Social’s $2.5 billion Bitcoin treasury plan is cited as a defense against financial institution harassment Devin Nunes Statement. The administration’s deregulation efforts, including rescinding 401(k) guidance, have contributed to a bullish market sentiment. Reactions from Stakeholders Reactions are varied, reflecting the polarized nature of the policies: Supporters: Industry leaders and crypto advocates praise the administration’s open-minded approach, with crypto billionaires like Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss joining a new members-only MAGA club in Washington Politico: MAGA Club and Crypto Billionaires. Trump’s crypto czar, Sacks, focuses on growing the market, arguing handling Trump’s business ties isn’t part of his job . Critics: Democrats and ethics watchdogs are alarmed by crypto becoming a centerpiece of Trump’s business and administration, with potential influence by industry players and foreign actors. Concerns include Justin Sun’s $20 million spend on Trump coins amid paused SEC fraud charges, with half of dinner attendees likely from overseas, traced to exchanges barring U.S. customers (The Guardian: Concerns Over Justin Sun, Washington Post: Overseas Attendees). Market Participants: Small investors have faced losses in Trump’s meme coin ventures, while Trump-affiliated businesses have profited significantly, raising fairness and transparency concerns. Market Trends and Impact The market trends reflect a strong positive response to the policies: Bitcoin Performance: Bitcoin’s price reached a record this month, up 16% since January 2025 and 57% over the past year, driven by the administration’s pro-crypto stance . Industry Growth: The crypto industry is booming, with new initiatives like Truth Social’s Bitcoin treasury and the Trump family’s backing of bitcoin mining firms and stablecoin launches. Investor Confidence: The administration’s deregulation and support have contributed to a bullish market sentiment, with crypto seen as thriving under Trump’s leadership, as stated by VP JD Vance . Summary Table: Key Policy Actions and Impacts Action Goal Positive Impact Negative Concern Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Treat Bitcoin as reserve asset Boosts U.S. leadership, market growth Ethics concerns over Trump’s investments Support for Stablecoins Promote dollar sovereignty Enhances global financial influence Potential market volatility Deregulation (e.g., 401(k) guidance) Foster innovation Increases investor access, market boom Risk of speculative bubbles Prohibition of CBDCs Favor decentralized assets Aligns with industry preferences Limits future policy flexibility Appointment of Crypto Czar and Summit Engage industry leaders Fosters collaboration, innovation Perceived as favoring industry interests This table summarizes the key actions, their intended goals, and the dual nature of their impacts, reflecting both opportunities and challenges. Conclusion The Trump administration’s cryptocurrency policies in 2025 represent a bold, pro-crypto stance aimed at positioning the U.S. as a global leader in digital finance. While these policies have driven market growth and innovation, with Bitcoin reaching record highs, they are highly controversial, with significant ethics and corruption concerns raised by critics. The political landscape is divided, with Democrats and ethics watchdogs opposing the policies, while industry leaders and some Republicans support them. The economic impact is largely positive, but the long-term implications, especially regarding transparency and conflict of interest, remain to be seen. Key Citations White House Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Establishes Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Presidential Action: Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology Washington Post: Trump Administration Ramps Up Push as Crypto Ally The Guardian: Top Democrat Demands Answers on Trump’s Major Crypto Ties Politico: Trump’s Week of Crypto Embrace Continues Despite Ethics Concerns Devin Nunes Statement on Truth Social Bitcoin Treasury Washington Post: Analysis of Trump’s Crypto Investor Losses The Guardian: Concerns Over Trump Crypto Corruption and Ethics Washington Post: Overseas Attendees at Trump Meme Coin Dinner Democracy Defenders Fund: Estimate of Trump’s Crypto Ventures Worth

US JUDGE REJECTS TRUMP EXECUTIVE ORDER AGAINST LAW FIRM WILMERHALE - COURT FILING

Every day I see more and more content around MEV and the negative rake it takes on the industry. People are realizing this is a bug not a feature and that we need to solve it in order for DeFi to compete with TradFi.

HOW THE DREAM OF DECENTRALIZATION DIED IN THE HANDS OF WHALES Title: Bitcoin's Centralization Crisis: How the Dream of Decentralization Died in the Hands of Whales By: iTrade | Institute Date: 30 May 2025 INTRODUCTION When Satoshi Nakamoto published the Bitcoin whitepaper in 2008, it wasn’t merely a technological innovation, it was a revolutionary manifesto. Bitcoin was designed as a decentralized, peer-to-peer financial system, immune to the manipulation of centralized authorities. But fast forward to today, and the uncomfortable truth becomes apparent: Bitcoin has failed to eliminate centralization. In fact, it has quietly concentrated wealth and power into the hands of a minuscule elite. This article explores how Bitcoin, the symbol of financial sovereignty, has ironically succumbed to the very forces it sought to dismantle. As traders, economists, and observers of market psychology, it is essential to confront this reality without bias. 1. THE 1% PROBLEM: An Economic Analysis Recent studies from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) found that approximately 0.01% of Bitcoin wallet addresses control 27% of the total supply (NBER, 2021). A separate report by Cointelegraph stated that 1.86% of wallets hold over 90% of all Bitcoin (Cointelegraph, 2021). In classical economics, such concentration mirrors the very oligopolistic systems that Bitcoin was built to disintermediate. In this scenario, price discovery becomes inefficient and prone to manipulation. Large holders can distort fair value perception through timed sales, fake liquidity placements (spoofing), and coordinated dumps. 2. MARKET PSYCHOLOGY: Whales and Fear Control the Narrative In trading psychology, the presence of large players (whales) introduces fear-based behavior among retail investors. These whales dominate both the spot and derivatives markets, and their wallet movements are often tracked on-chain by traders for clues. But by the time a signal is seen, it's often too late, the trap is already set. Whales use futures manipulation tactics to profit. This typically involves: ~Spoofing order books on exchanges to create artificial demand or supply. ~Open interest flooding to make the market look extremely bullish or bearish. ~Triggering cascading liquidations by strategically placing sell orders that push the market just enough to break key support zones, activating leverage stop-outs on the futures side. "Retail traders, following crowd sentiment, panic sell or buy at the worst possible time. This results in mass liquidation events that disproportionately benefit large holders who accumulate at lows and sell into irrational highs" 3. SENTIMENTAL ANALYSIS: Satoshi’s Dream vs. Today’s Reality Bitcoin's early sentiment was rooted in liberation from state-backed monetary policy and centralized intermediaries. But current market sentiment has shifted drastically. A 2024 report by Glassnode revealed that more than 30% of Bitcoin has been held for over 5 years, indicating strong long-term hands (Glassnode, 2024). While this may seem bullish, it also reveals the reality: a massive supply is locked out of circulation, effectively making Bitcoin scarce not due to user demand, but due to hoarding. This behavior supports price manipulation. Whales can: ~Absorb supply silently during fear cycles. ~Wait for sentiment peaks (usually around halving narratives or ETF news) to distribute. ~Create controlled euphoria and fear via partnerships with influencers, media, and coordinated on-chain activity. 4. THE ILLUSION OF DECENTRALIZATION From an infrastructure standpoint, centralization goes beyond wallet concentration: ~Mining centralization: As of 2024, two mining pools control over 50% of the global hash rate (BTC.com Pool Stats). This raises the threat of collusion and potential 51% attacks. ~Exchange centralization: Over 90% of trading volume flows through a handful of centralized exchanges, many of which are opaque in order flow transparency (Kaiko, 2023). ~Institutional domination: The approval of Bitcoin ETFs and the increasing role of custodial giants like BlackRock and Fidelity further concentrate Bitcoin access within old financial frameworks. "Bitcoin is decentralized in theory, but centralized in practice' This duality seduces the uninformed retail investor while handing leverage and narrative control to institutions and early whales. Conclusion: A Call for Critical Re-Evaluation As professional traders, we must look beyond charts and cycles. Bitcoin is no longer the tool of revolution it once claimed to be. It has become, instead, a complex playground dominated by elite actors, feeding off retail emotion and media manipulation. This is not a call to abandon Bitcoin. Rather, it is a call to awaken. To demand transparency. To rethink mechanisms of distribution, access, and power in this new digital economy. Because if decentralization was the goal, we must admit: we have strayed far from the path. REFERENCES: 1. National Bureau of Economic Research (2021). "Blockchain Analysis of the Bitcoin Market." 2. Cointelegraph (2021). "1% of Bitcoin Holders Control 90% of Supply." 3. Glassnode Insights (2024). "Long-Term Holders Accumulate Over 30% of BTC Supply." 4. BTC.com Pool Distribution (2024). 5. Kaiko Research (2023). "The Realities of Exchange Centralization." 6. IntoTheBlock (2024). "Futures Liquidations and Whale Activity Analysis." 7. Chainalysis (2023). "Tracking Institutional Movement in Bitcoin." 8. CryptoQuant (2023). "Order Book Spoofing and Market Microstructure." Gud night