ZeroLend 價格ZERO

🔥 NEW: Pumpfun has launched PumpSwap, a native DEX where all coins completing their bonding curve will now migrate automatically with zero fees, increased liquidity, and future creator revenue sharing.

Lace, a web3 non-custodial wallet developed by Input Output, is now multichain, with initial support including Bitcoin. Input Output, an infrastructure and web3 research platform founded in 2015 by Charles Hoskinson and Jeremy Wood, announced the development via a press release on Mar. 20. Hoskinson is the founder of Cardano ( ADA ), one of the top cryptocurrency and blockchain projects. According to IO, the Lace wallet’s non-custodial solution is now officially multichain. The launch expands the wallet’s support beyond Cardano, with initial support for Bitcoin ( BTC ). “The future of blockchain is multichain, and with Lace, we’re making sure users have everything they need in one powerful, easy-to-use wallet. Building on the foundations we have established with Cardano, we identified Bitcoin as the logical next step. And we’re just getting started,” Brandon Wolf, general manager at Lace, said. Lace now allows its users to store, manage, and transfer BTC. According to IO, the integration of BTC is a milestone that brings web3 closer to reality. This is because the support does not only help accelerate adoption for Bitcoin—it also boosts the broader ecosystem. As the top blockchain network sees increased traction across decentralized finance and smart contracts, several layer-2 solutions built on top of it are gaining further adoption. “Bitcoin was the starting point for many people’s Web3 journey, and now we are witnessing its next evolution with the rise of Bitcoin DeFi. With Bitcoin integration now live, Lace is creating a seamless, intuitive gateway to maximise the best of blockchain innovation” Hoskinson said. The integration provides an “intuitive gateway” that will help maximize blockchain innovation and add to the growth of DeFi, the Cardano founder added. Other than DeFi, Lace’s web3 traction includes non-fungible tokens and multi-chain asset management. Bitcoin continues to attract attention for its potential, with zero-knowledge powered platform BitcoinOS among those to champion its integration with crypto. The project’s open-sourcing of its BitSNARK v0.2 unlocks unlimited BTC programmability, the protocol’s team posted on X. BitcoinOS’ code allows anyone to verify ZK proofs on Bitcoin.

🇺🇸 OPINION: Do you think Trump will announce zero tax on crypto capital gains at the Digital Asset Summit in NYC today? 👇

, medium, and small orders. Key Observations and Trend Analysis: 1-Day Fund Flow (Donut Chart): Large Order Outflow Dominates: The largest segment (49.74%) represents "Large Order Outflow," indicating a significant selling pressure from large holders. Medium Order Inflow: A notable portion (49.71%) is "Medium Order Inflow," suggesting buying activity from mid-sized traders. Small Order Balance: Small order buy and sell are relatively balanced, with slightly more sell activity. Interpretation: This suggests a potential short-term bearish trend, as large holders are selling. However, the strong medium order buying could indicate some underlying support. Order Book Depth (Buy vs. Sell): Large Orders: Buy (4.30K BTC) is slightly less than Sell (4.38K BTC), reinforcing the large order outflow trend. Medium and Small Orders: The numbers for medium and small orders are not as easy to understand from the ichart. Interpretation: The slight imbalance in large orders favors sellers, which could push the price down. 5-Day Large Order Net Inflow (Histogram): Negative Net Inflow: The "SO main funds net inflow" is -222,821,411, a large negative number. This signifies a substantial net outflow of funds from large orders over the past 5 days. Fluctuations: The histogram shows fluctuations, but overall, it remains below the zero line, indicating sustained net selling pressure. Interpretation: This confirms a bearish trend in large order activity over the past 5 days. The significant negative value suggests a strong and persistent selling trend. 24-Hour Funds Net Inflow (Line Graph): Volatility: The line graph shows significant volatility, with sharp peaks and troughs. Recent Uptick: There's a noticeable uptick towards the right side of the graph, indicating a recent increase in net fund inflow. Interpretation: The 24-hour data shows short-term fluctuations, but the recent uptick could signal a potential short-term bullish reversal or a period of consolidation after the recent negative trend. However, it is too short of a time frame to make a true judgement. Overall Trend Assessment: Short-Term (1 Day): Mixed signals. Large order selling pressure is a concern, but medium order buying provides some support. The 24-hour uptick could indicate a potential short-term reversal. Mid-Term (5 Days): Bearish. The sustained negative net inflow of large orders over 5 days suggests a strong and persistent selling trend. disclaimer : don't agree with me do your investment at your own research and risk.

Ripple CTO David Schwartz recently joined a conversation sparked by longtime Bitcoin advocate Bruce Fenton about why Bitcoin isn’t really used for day-to-day transactions anymore. Fenton, CEO of Chainstone Lab, pointed out that about ten years ago, you could actually use BTC for regular purchases. He mentioned that back in 2015, over 130 restaurants in Portsmouth, NH, were accepting Bitcoin. Even at the Satoshi Roundtable , a major crypto conference, more than 70% of ticket sales were paid in Bitcoin back then. But now, those numbers are close to zero. Fenton sees this decline as a failure. He argues that money must be used for transactions, not just held as an investment. “Using Bitcoin for purchases is a great way to grow the network,” he said. Many believe Bitcoin’s high fees and slow transaction speeds have made it impractical for payments. Mandrik, a Bitcoin user, suggests that people now view it as a long-term asset. “They don’t want to look back in five years and regret spending $5,000 on a cheeseburger,” he said. Ripple CTO David Schwartz argued that Bitcoin worked for payments when people didn’t consider it real money. He added that Bitcoin was mostly used for payments when the early adopters got it super cheap. Once its value went up, fewer people wanted to spend it. “Once the supply of early miners who got Bitcoin nearly for free dried up, there was no longer any reason to pay with Bitcoin,” Schwartz said. Meanwhile, Jack Mehof, an early Bitcoin supporter, echoes Schwartz’s perspective. He stated that while he once paid for beer, tacos, and coffee with BTC. But eventually, the rising costs and slow speeds made it too much of a hassle. Schwartz also pointed out that there are many other cryptocurrencies out there with lower transaction costs and faster speeds. But, as he pointed out, “You don’t see much retail payment use of those either. At least not yet.“ Related: Donald Trump Makes History by Embracing Bitcoin Payments for Campaign Some experts believe Bitcoin’s decline as a payment method is more about regulations than technical limitations. Wayne Vaughan argues that tax laws and banking restrictions have made Bitcoin payments difficult. “The tax treatment of Bitcoin is a major barrier. Companies accepting Bitcoin faced significant accounting burdens, and banks have been incredibly hostile,” he said. Dave Weisberger agrees , saying that capital gains taxes make spending Bitcoin too expensive. “Every purchase effectively costs 24% more due to capital gains taxes,” he explained. Sam Jones added that a tax exemption for small Bitcoin transactions—similar to foreign currency rules—could encourage more spending. Some blame the Lightning Network for failing to deliver on its promise of cheap and fast transactions. Meanwhile, some argue Bitcoin’s primary role has shifted to being a store of value, similar to gold. Related: Veteran investor Breaks Down Bitcoin’s Bull Run: Miners, Investors, and What to Expect Next for the Price Even with regulatory fixes, some question whether Bitcoin payments will ever compete with traditional methods. Anders, a financial advisor, believes fiat remains the more convenient option. “People aren’t going to use Bitcoin if it creates a worse payment experience,” he said. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.