Hello Puppy 價格BOB

Nostr "Zaps" are a perfect example A huge percentage (likely 80%+), use custodial wallets such as Primal. If you zap custodial-to-custodial, then you did not use a single lightning txn. You have zero privacy, and zero recourse if your custodian takes all of your money (which they can do at any time). It is as far from Bitcoin as it is possible to get. But -- it has "zap" in the name! To trick gullible people, into thinking they are "using lightning". (And using Bitcoin.) They aren't. At this point, some LN supporters might attempt to retreat to a different argument, which goes like this: "okay, but what if Alice signs up with custodian1 ; Bob signs up with custodian2 , and then Alice wants to zap Bob ? Won't there be (at least) one lightning txn, between custodian1 and custodian2 ? Admittedly, sure: Alice and Bob are not using lightning (and, in fact, they are not using any part of the Bitcoin network at all), but isn't it still the case that one additional LN txn has now appeared (?), between custodian1 and custodian2? Doesn't that still count, as 'lightning being used'? I mean, at least *someone* is using LN, when I zap -- even if it isn't me." Even that argument, enormously-watered-down as it is, is false: 1. You don't know how your custodians settle up. It could be LN, or anything else. You have no way of knowing. 2. If the custodians are large, prominent, and few in number, then they will have direct channel connections with each other. They will not need the lightning network, nor HTLCs (even of the older 2014 Tier Nolan variety). Nothing in the LN whitepaper or spec, will help them at all. And eventually this whole charade will be destroyed by an L2 that actually works. Hence, Lightning -- far from being evidence of Bitcoin's growth -- is instead evidence of the community's slide into lies and cultlike delusion. People attack those (such as myself) who tell the truth, and who want people to actually use Bitcoin. And, they defend the worst-of-the-worst, services that take your Bitcoin away from you, and which lie to the community on a colossal scale.

Send it, Bob 📈 $ETH

.@QuantumFusion_ just shared a live demo of a full on-chain chess game built with PolkaVM smart contracts. This is about what the network can handle. 🔹 Two players (Alice & Bob) play in real time 🔹 All game logic runs on-chain 🔹 The board updates instantly after each move 🔹 The state is shown through node logs using QF’s native print function 🔹 Players can create, join, and play games through an interactive script Why it matters: Most blockchains can’t support fast, interactive applications like this. QF Network handles it with smooth performance, showing what’s possible for real-time apps like games, DeFi tools, and more. The demo shows: » Fast block times (0.1s finality) » Smooth gameplay with no delays » Useful tools for developers to debug and monitor state This is just a basic use case, but it shows how QF’s architecture is designed to support advanced, real-time on-chain apps. $QF is still early, but the tech is already working.

BOB @Build_on_bob_CH 这步棋走的很妙 👍 【比特币 DeFi 史诗级狂欢】特别期待🥳 现在手里不缺 $BTC ，缺一个BTC DeFi好去处 😆 #BTCDeFi

Bob McGrew, Head of Research @ OpenAI regarding the counter positioning against Google """ This was true even before I joined OpenAl, by the way. I believe it was actually Greg Brockman's idea. But we really wanted to eliminate the distinction between engineers and researchers.