Epic Cash 價格EPIC

$AAVE Looking epic. If we close the weekly candle like this, its a very meaningful shift. -> 185 should become very sensitive to price, look for S/R re-tests -> If a large pull back is given, additional discount into weekly draw @ 155 that overlaps with the iFVG would be the precision entry (but less likely to get it). With Ethereum reclaiming the 2k-4k range, there is no reason to be bearish here, unless we fall back out of the range (and AAVE puts in a weekly SFP instead of a strong close etc).

Absolutely epic collapse by Moderna 🚨 $MRNA plunged to its lowest closing price since the onset of Covid 📉 Shares have now plummeted 95% since the August 2021 all-time high, a total market cap loss of more than $200 Billion 👀👀

Dungeon Morning Dragons 🐉 🚨 $DGN first CEX listing incoming—stay tuned! 📢 Ambassadorship program apps open this week! 🎮 Kosmic Quest thriving with new players + 2 epic games dropping in May & June! For more info

Apple filed an emergency appeal on Monday night to overturn a U.S. judge’s ruling that forces the company to open its App Store to more competition. The tech giant submitted the request to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, asking it to review a decision issued on April 30. That ruling accused Apple of ignoring an earlier court order from 2021 tied to an antitrust lawsuit filed by Epic Games in 2020. The goal of that original case was to break Apple’s hold on how apps are distributed and how payments are processed on iPhones. The recent ruling, handed down by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, said Apple “willfully failed” to obey her previous order, which required the company to let developers direct users to cheaper third-party payment options. Gonzalez Rogers made it clear the company’s delay tactics were intentional. She refused to let Apple pause the enforcement of her latest order and referred the case to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation. One of Apple’s unnamed executives was also referred alongside the company. “Apple sought to maintain a revenue stream worth billions in direct defiance of this court’s injunction,” Gonzalez Rogers wrote in her decision, which was first reported by Reuters. Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Apple’s response to her 2021 injunction involved new policies that directly clashed with the intent of the court’s order. One of those policies was a fresh 27% fee slapped on developers whose customers made purchases outside the App Store. She said the fee was designed to block developers from fully benefiting from the order. She also criticized the company for deploying what she called “scare screens” — pop-up warnings that discouraged users from choosing third-party payment systems. The judge said those screens were aimed at intimidating customers into staying inside Apple’s payment framework, despite the fact that the court had ordered the company to stop interfering with alternative options. Apple, for its part, denied violating the 2021 injunction. The company’s court filing didn’t outline its full legal strategy but confirmed it will challenge the contempt finding and try to stop the order from being enforced. The company didn’t comment further or offer any explanation for the 27% fee or the warnings embedded in its interface. The appeal now moves to the Ninth Circuit, but unless that court intervenes, Apple will be required to start allowing outside payment choices and stop using tactics that block them. KEY Difference Wire : the secret tool crypto projects use to get guaranteed media coverage

A U.S. District Court decision now requires Apple to update its App Store rules, compelling the company to permit crypto and NFT app developers to link users to external payment options free of Apple’s fees. This was from an April 30th ruling where the court found Apple violated a 2021 injunction connected to its antitrust battle with Epic Games. In the court filing, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers determined Apple intentionally violated the earlier injunction. The judge characterized Apple’s ongoing actions regarding external links and payments as anticompetitive and stated they would not be permitted to continue. The ruling explicitly orders Apple to stop imposing commissions or fees on transactions completed outside its App Store payment system. The company is also prohibited from auditing or monitoring these external transactions. Developers now cannot be prevented from including external payment links within their apps. Judge Rogers specified Apple cannot dictate how developers implement or display links directing users to outside payment systems. The ruling also forbids Apple from excluding specific app categories or developers from utilizing external linking features. Related: Hoskinson: Apple, Microsoft Crypto Entry Could Be Key to $250k Bitcoin This court decision grants developers building for the U.S. App Store significantly more freedom, especially those working with digital assets. They can now directly insert buttons or links leading users to NFT marketplaces or other crypto services for purchases. Previously, platforms like the NFT marketplace OpenSea were severely restricted on iOS, allowing users only to browse NFTs, not buy them through external links without violating Apple’s rules. Related: Apple Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Crypto Payments Restrictions Apple informed developers about the mandated changes through updated App Store guidelines. Some industry watchers described the tone of Apple’s communication as reluctant, but the new rules are effective immediately. Following Apple’s guideline update, Appfigures CEO Ariel Michaeli confirmed developers no longer need special “entitlements” from Apple to link out to external NFT or payment systems, though he noted Apple’s wording might create some confusion. Crypto commentators like “Xero” and Alex Masmej reacted positively, calling the policy change beneficial and significant for the industry. Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney also commented on the development and announced Epic plans to relaunch its popular game Fortnite on the U.S. iOS App Store following the decision. Sweeney added Epic would drop its ongoing and future legal actions against Apple if the company applied these same rule changes globally, not just in the U.S. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.