SpaceCatch narxCATCH

Hello Bitget Square family! 😊 The crypto market is full of surprises, and today, we're diving into the latest developments for $TRUMP /USDT, which has just gone through a major shakeout. But is this a reason to panic? Absolutely not! In fact, this might be the golden entry opportunity many traders have been waiting for! 🎯 📉 What Just Happened? Market Shakeout or Smart Money Move? In the past few days, $TRUMP /USDT has experienced a sharp pullback, breaking below its previous support level at $14 and dipping close to $12. This kind of move can be alarming at first glance, but let’s take a closer look: ✅ The previous low was $14, and now we have a slightly lower low around $12. But here’s the catch – this is a weak lower low, meaning that the selling pressure is not strong enough to sustain a downtrend. 📉 ✅ Low Volume on the Drop – When a price drop happens with low volume, it usually means that most sellers have already exited, and smart money is accumulating at a discount. 💰 ✅ Fibonacci Support at $11.83 – This level is key because it aligns with the Fibonacci retracement, a strong support area where buyers typically step in. If the price stays above this, expect a big rebound soon! 🚀 📈 What’s Next? The Case for a 700% Upside! While the short-term dip may seem concerning, the bigger picture tells a different story. Here's why many traders believe $TRUMP /USDT is preparing for an explosive rally: 🔹 Market Sentiment Shift – The broader crypto market is turning bullish, and TRUMP/USDT is likely to follow the trend. March 2025 is expected to kick off a major altcoin season, which could push this token higher. 🚀 Reclaiming Key Levels – If $TRUMP /USDT can hold support at $11.83 and break back above $14, it could trigger a massive reversal leading to new highs. 🔹 Potential for 700% Growth – Based on past price action, if $TRUMP /USDT follows its previous breakout patterns, we could see 700%+ gains from current levels, especially as new market catalysts emerge! 🌟 📊 Trading Strategy: How to Play This Setup? 🎯 For Spot Traders: Buy the Dip – Accumulate as long as prices hold above $11.83. Patience is Key – If funds are limited, hold and wait for the next leg up. 🎯 For Leverage Traders: Wait for Confirmation – A daily close above $14 would confirm the reversal. Manage Risk – Use stop-loss orders below $11.50 to minimize downside risk. 🔥 Final Thoughts: The Best is Yet to Come! This recent shakeout in $TRUMP /USDT looks like a classic market trap designed to flush out weak hands before the next major bullish wave. With key support holding, low-volume selling, and a strong likelihood of a market-wide uptrend in March, this could be one of the best accumulation zones before a massive rally. Are you ready for the next big move? Let’s see how high $TRUMP /USDT can go! 🚀🔥 Thank you for reading, and stay tuned for more updates! 📢

Flip flop only accounts for a macro view where one talks moon one day and then doom the next in an instance. Seems so few people understand that trading is completely different. Each time frame has its own trend. you get so many different styles of trading. When we are early cycle/mid cycle it's easy to have a sit back position..then there comes times to be reactive to what the market gives you especially if things gets murky. If you are a long term investor and do not trade then it should be your priority to realize when things change on a macro HTF view and then you need to act upon that as well. No one will help you make those decisions. If things have not changed for you then stand your ground-I will never encourage you to sell any coin..I will however encourage you to make a plan. Even when I say that to try and help if things goes south then its an issue because I am leaning bearish when all it is - is to encourage a plan for either making money or a plan to protect your capital so that you can increase or eventually increase your coins. I got a comment that said I can not sell at a 30% loss. I thought the same with 2021 down turn..some of those coins went from a 30 to a 98% loss- do not get stuck..go through 5's comments and you will see he says it was very hard to sell his spot at a loss but because he done so he could then buy back lower..ride it..then sold higher again. Obviously 5 trades and has learned to flow with the market, but I am trying to make a point that sometimes it's better to survive- especially of you have leverage plays then it's important to protect yourself. If you are in spot then learn to recognize weakness in your chosen time frame. If it's the very high time frame like from a cycle pov then unfortunately that weakness will only become evident later. That's why following a plan is important. Same goes for strength when a cycle starts. Have your system or your signals. And if you just go of macro views then use that as well. If you don't know anything then a simple dca strategy is one of the most proven win strategies out there..dca in and dca out. I try and look at most things for confluence and have my way of reading trend which allows me to catch bottoms and tops..but if I DO miss them which can happen and will happen at times then I also work from weakness and strength on certain time frames..also work from certain levels. Which can be played in both directions. Also TA ALWAYS work..charts always 1st. It does not mean it does not work if it does not allign with your bias anymore. Cycles always remain. "It's different". It's not..cycles change dynamically over time. You also get left and right translated cycles. You get different types of cycles inside bigger cycles..again time frame dependant. Everything has its cycle..figuring it out is where it's at. 5 shows how it's done with trading.

These are the questions i’d ask the charts regarding SMT-Fills: - How can I use SMT-Fill to catch reversal trades? - How can I use SMT-Fill to catch continuation trades? - What usually occurs inside of a SMT-Fill gap before we trade away from it?

Whats the difference between crypto tokens, game artifacts and any other digital value? My view on Digital Asset Regulation. You might not know this. Computer Gaming "Skins" are outperforming stocks and crypto right now. While crypto is stuck in suppression waiting for sovereign entry through beuracratic approval, the CS2 gaming skin and artifact market is booming. The total value of digital weapon skins in CS2 has now exceeded $4.3 billion, and one skin was recently sold for $1 million. More and more players see skins as an investment – the game’s popularity keeps pushing prices higher. While some are waiting for crypto to recover, others are flipping digital weapons and clothing in games for massive profits. So once again @DavidSacks @BankingGOP @SenatorTimScott @SECGov @HesterPeirce @CarolineDPham what is the difference between blockchain tokens and gaming skins? They are both the same thing according to Howey. The Howey is BROKEN in 2025. Rewrite a new test including digital and decentralized, non-counterparty public value. You cannot massage this domain to fit a 1934 rule test thats idiotic. Restart - I have ideas. Notes: - These gaming markets and crypto casinos are not regulated. Why? Whats the difference? - Why was crypto called a security 4 years ago? Whats the difference? - Please address this fundemental right to own and trade digital value, no matter what it is. It is a first ammendment right. - It is digital perceived value and has cryptographic security. Catch up please. We can choose to give value to anything we want. It is not up to the administration to decide what is valuable. IMO: Blockchain network tokens have never been securities. There are no counterparties. One side is a machine running code and the other a machine running a wallet. There is no 1934 law that applies to this. Write new ones for the love of everything good. Tokens can represent anything. Thats why they called "tokens". Categories of blockchain tokens: - 1) Public Blockchain Network Native Tokens $BTC $ETH $SOL etc. - commodities. Public. Decentralized. No counterparties. New registration guideline required. They are not companies. There is no owner. They are publically owned and fall under GNU license for open source like Linux. Regulate under the Public Services commissions if anything to protect them. Own a Reserve of these to protect the public networks from foreign collusion. It is national security in 2025. These are commodities if they are sufficiently decentralized and heavily adopted. There can never be "companies" behind these. They are public open source and renounced. Their governance is through democratic voting. They have no jurisdiction and exist all over the world on the public internet. - 2) Private Network Native Tokens - tokens issued by companies on their own blockchain network (counterparties) - these can be private or public but have a clear agreement between a company and a user. These are securities under Howey but probably on a case by case basis require a new S-1 process to register as public services or public investments per jurisdiction. - 2) Utility Tokens - Tokens that are issued on public blockchain networks that represent something of value or an agreement between 2 counterparties. These can be Security Tokens, which are digital S-1 obligations tokenized on the blockchain. They can be Access Tokens which holders get the right to pass a digital gate for entry into another area of functionality, access or entry in the physical world. These can be Collectible Tokens, that have no use, no meaning and are just something someone wants to own for emotional reasons. These can be RWA or Tokenized Real World Assets like shares and fractional ownership and rights. There are forms of utility tokens but they need to be regulated totally differently from Native Tokens, they have very little in common. I am available to help with these guidelines and have been in software in this domain since graduating MSC in Computer Science in Cape Town South Africa. Ive worked in the predecessor of blockchain, CORBA, Ive seen it all and have already been down the path of defining the domain. Let me help at least strawman the problem space. Some data: Here is the Counter Strike 2 Skins market vs Stocks and Crypto in 2025. Are these skins securities?

For years, Bitcoin maxis have preached the idea of a post-dollar world—a future where fiat collapses, and decentralized currencies reign supreme. But what if we’ve been thinking about it backward? The U.S. doesn’t have to fight crypto to maintain control. It just has to absorb it. A U.S. digital asset reserve wouldn’t just be about holding Bitcoin, Ethereum, or tokenized treasuries. It would mark the quiet transition from a nation-state financial system to a ‘network-state’ dollar—one that exists not just in banks, but across blockchains. Here’s why this shift would be far more powerful than hyperbitcoinization—and why nobody sees it coming. 1. A digital asset reserve is the Trojan Horse for a blockchain-based dollar Most assume a digital asset reserve means the U.S. is acknowledging Bitcoin as digital gold or Ethereum as financial infrastructure. But that’s the surface-level play. The real strategy? Consolidating U.S. financial dominance across every chain. Holding Bitcoin isn’t about endorsing it—it’s about controlling a key liquidity layer in global markets. Holding Ethereum isn’t about supporting DeFi—it’s about embedding U.S. financial rails into the world’s most powerful settlement network. Tokenized treasuries on-chain? That’s U.S. debt becoming the de facto collateral for all digital markets. Once the U.S. establishes a reserve of digital assets, it doesn’t just gain exposure—it gains leverage over the very infrastructure that underpins Web3. 2. The network-state dollar: A sovereign currency without borders Historically, the dollar’s power came from military strength and trade dominance. But in the digital world, control isn’t about borders—it’s about network effects. If the U.S. moves its financial backbone on-chain, the dollar ceases to be just a national currency—it becomes a protocol. Instead of competing with crypto, the dollar evolves into a permissionless, programmable currency that operates across multiple blockchains. DeFi protocols that integrate tokenized treasuries? They become extensions of the U.S. financial system. CBDCs were the first idea, but a network-state dollar goes beyond a centralized system—it embeds itself into global liquidity layers without requiring government adoption. This isn’t hyperbitcoinization. It’s hyperdollarization—but with a blockchain twist. 3. A global liquidity war: The real competition isn’t crypto vs. fiat—it’s the U.S. vs. everyone else If the U.S. integrates a digital asset reserve, other nations are forced to react. China will push for the digital yuan’s presence on blockchain rails. Europe will accelerate tokenized euro markets to remain relevant. Emerging markets will have to decide—integrate into the U.S.-controlled liquidity system or build their own. But here’s the catch: most nations don’t have the liquidity to back their assets on-chain. The U.S. has $34 trillion in government debt. If even a fraction of that becomes tokenized, it outpaces any decentralized financial experiment we’ve ever seen. By holding crypto reserves, the U.S. doesn’t just hedge against digital assets—it makes sure the crypto economy depends on U.S. financial assets. Instead of being disrupted, the U.S. positions itself as the liquidity provider of last resort—for both fiat and crypto economies. Once this happens, it’s no longer crypto vs. fiat. It’s crypto, running on U.S. liquidity rails. 4. What this means for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the next decade of Web3 Bitcoin: The U.S. treating BTC as a reserve asset doesn’t mean they endorse it as money—it means they see it as geopolitical leverage. If BTC is systemically important, nations can be manipulated through its supply constraints. Ethereum: ETH doesn’t just survive regulation—it thrives. The network-state dollar would require a scalable, programmable settlement layer. Ethereum already has the infrastructure. DeFi: If tokenized treasuries dominate lending markets, most of DeFi stops being about decentralization and starts being about liquidity dominance. The real power moves won’t be in algorithmic stablecoins but in who controls the most collateral. Crypto-native resistance: The only way for decentralized systems to fight back is by building non-sovereign financial rails faster than institutions can integrate into existing ones. The bottom line: We’re not entering a post-dollar world—we’re entering the blockchain dollar era For all the talk about nation-states resisting crypto, the smarter move is to absorb it, integrate it, and control its liquidity. A U.S. digital asset reserve isn’t about supporting decentralization—it’s about making sure the next financial system is still built on American capital. If you thought the U.S. would lose control in a crypto-powered world, you weren’t thinking big enough.