Preço de AcetACT

$SUI Sui Coin, a rapidly growing cryptocurrency, prioritizes the security and protection of its users' assets and data. In the ever-evolving landscape of cryptocurrency, security is a top concern for investors, traders, and users. Sui Coin's commitment to security is reflected in its robust measures, designed to safeguard user assets and data. Multi-Layered Security Architecture Sui Coin's security architecture is designed to provide multiple layers of protection: - *Encryption*: Sui Coin uses advanced encryption algorithms to protect user data and assets, ensuring that sensitive information remains confidential. - *Secure Wallets*: Sui Coin's wallets are designed with security in mind, featuring robust encryption, secure key management, and two-factor authentication. - *Network Protection*: Sui Coin's network is protected by a robust firewall, intrusion detection, and prevention systems, ensuring that unauthorized access is prevented. Advanced Consensus Algorithm Sui Coin's consensus algorithm is designed to provide an additional layer of security: - *Proof-of-Stake (PoS)*: Sui Coin uses a PoS consensus algorithm, which ensures that validators are incentivized to act honestly, reducing the risk of 51% attacks. - *Randomized Block Selection*: Sui Coin's consensus algorithm features randomized block selection, making it more difficult for malicious actors to predict and manipulate the network. Regular Security Audits and Testing Sui Coin's security team conducts regular security audits and testing: - *Vulnerability Scanning*: Sui Coin's security team conducts regular vulnerability scanning to identify potential weaknesses in the network. - *Penetration Testing*: Sui Coin's security team conducts regular penetration testing to simulate real-world attacks and identify areas for improvement. Community Engagement and Education Sui Coin's security team prioritizes community engagement and education: - *Security Guides*: Sui Coin provides comprehensive security guides to help users protect their assets and data. - *Community Outreach*: Sui Coin's security team engages with the community, providing education and support to help users stay safe online. Incident Response Plan Sui Coin has a comprehensive incident response plan in place: - *Incident Detection*: Sui Coin's security team has implemented robust incident detection systems to quickly identify potential security incidents. - *Incident Response*: Sui Coin's security team has developed a comprehensive incident response plan, outlining procedures for responding to security incidents. Conclusion In conclusion, Sui Coin prioritizes the security and protection of its users' assets and data. With its robust security measures, advanced consensus algorithm, regular security audits and testing, community engagement and education, and incident response plan, Sui Coin provides a secure and trustworthy platform for users to invest, trade, and store their digital assets. References: [1] Sui Coin Whitepaper [2] Sui Coin Website [3] CoinMarketCap: Sui Coin Price and Market Capitalization

Congressman and Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) announced on March 6 that he has reintroduced the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, a bill designed to prevent the federal government from creating a central bank digital currency (CBDC) that could compromise Americans’ financial privacy. The legislation, which has gained the support of 100 Republican cosponsors, seeks to ensure that a CBDC cannot be used as a tool for government surveillance or control over financial transactions. Emmer warned of the risks associated with a government-issued digital currency, stating: If not designed to be open, permissionless, and private – resembling cash – a government-issued CBDC is nothing more than an Orwellian surveillance tool that would be used to erode the American way of life. Originally introduced in January 2022, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act has now been brought forward multiple times, with this latest version representing another attempt to block CBDC development. The bill specifically prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC directly to individuals, preventing it from becoming a retail bank with access to personal financial data. It also stops the Fed from using a CBDC to implement monetary policy and bars the Treasury Department from directing the Fed to create one. Emmer emphasized the urgency of codifying protections against CBDCs, referencing President Donald Trump’s stance on the issue. He stressed: President Trump understands the dangers CBDCs present and has already issued an executive order prohibiting federal agencies from exploring one. Now, we must codify this executive order in law and permanently ban their development so a future administration cannot weaponize this technology against Americans. The bill previously passed the U.S. House of Representatives during the 118th Congress and continues to be a focal point for Republicans concerned about financial privacy. Supporters argue that a CBDC could grant the federal government unprecedented access to citizens’ financial activities, allowing it to monitor transactions or restrict politically disfavored activities. Critics of the bill, however, contend that a well-structured CBDC could modernize the financial system and enhance payment security without threatening individual freedoms. As discussions over digital currency and financial privacy intensify, the fate of the legislation will depend on legislative negotiations and public opinion. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

The U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs announced on March 6 that Chairman Tim Scott (R-S.C.) is leading an effort to eliminate the use of reputational risk in banking regulations through the Financial Integrity and Regulation Management (FIRM) Act. The legislation, supported by all Republican members of the committee, aims to prevent federal banking agencies from using reputational risk as a supervisory factor when evaluating financial institutions. Scott emphasized the urgency of addressing debanking, stating: As Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, I have made addressing debanking a top priority. This discriminatory and un-American practice should concern everyone … It’s clear that federal regulators have abused reputational risk by carrying out a political agenda against federally legal businesses. “This legislation, which eliminates all references to reputational risk in regulatory supervision, is the first step in ending debanking once and for all,” he added. Other committee Republicans, including Senators Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), echoed Scott’s concerns, arguing that regulators have misused their authority to unfairly deny financial services to lawful businesses. Scott has made debanking a primary focus of his leadership, holding hearings and discussions to investigate cases where regulators pressured financial institutions to sever ties with certain clients. In a recent Senate Banking Committee hearing, Scott challenged Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on the issue, leading Powell to commit to working with the committee to address it. The FIRM Act mandates the removal of reputational risk from regulatory supervision, prohibits federal agencies from implementing related policies, and requires agencies to report to Congress on compliance. Scott and his Republican colleagues argue that the bill is necessary to ensure financial regulators do not use their authority to enforce political agendas under the guise of regulatory oversight. Several senators condemned what the lawmakers see as an abuse of regulatory power, particularly targeting industries or individuals based on political considerations. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) strongly criticized financial regulators, stating: “Federal banking agencies have brazenly abused their power, strangling legitimate businesses through politically motivated ‘reputational risk’ designations while hiding behind a façade of independence. The FIRM Act strips away their ability to play politics with our financial system and finally holds these unelected bureaucrats accountable.” She added: Americans deserve a transparent regulatory framework that fosters innovation in digital assets instead of smothering it with government overreach. We’re putting these rogue regulators on notice—their days of unchecked power are over. Other senators, including Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) and Katie Britt (R-Ala.), argued that the legislation would restore fairness by ensuring regulators base decisions on objective financial risks rather than political preferences. Senator Tillis added that the FIRM Act would “stop this political weaponization and ensure regulators focus on real financial risks, not personal or political agendas.” 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

✨️Today's Top10 Trending Crypto✨️ #PROS #BTT #ATH #TRX #BNX #KAITO #ACT #VINE #RAY #BURGER

Why was Bitcoin invented in the first place? It’s not just ‘digital money’—it’s a solution to one of the biggest financial problems of our time. Here’s why Bitcoin matters. I'll start by posing a question: How do you send a message securely when you can’t trust the messenger? Imagine an army preparing to attack a heavily fortified city. The generals, spread across different locations, must coordinate an attack at the exact same time—but they can only communicate through unreliable messengers who might be intercepted, delayed, or even send false information. If just one general receives the wrong signal and attacks too soon or too late, the entire mission fails. So... 🔹 How can they reach consensus when they can’t fully trust each other? This is the Byzantine Generals Problem—a classic dilemma in computer science that describes the challenge of achieving agreement in a system where some participants might be unreliable or even malicious. Now, replace those generals with computers on a decentralized global network. Before Bitcoin, digital money had a major problem: 👉 How do you ensure transactions are valid when no single party is in charge? And... 👉 How do you stop someone from spending the same money twice (double-spending) without relying on a central bank or payment processor? At the moment, we trust banks to hold our money, payment processors to move it, and central banks to preserve its value. But what happens when these institutions fail or act against our interests? If a bank freezes your account, if a payment processor blocks a transaction, or if a central bank inflates away your savings—you feel the pain. This is why solving the Byzantine Generals Problem is so important. By removing the need for trust, Bitcoin created a monetary system that operates independently of centralized control. It allows anyone to send money without interference, ensuring transactions are final, secure, and censorship-resistant. For decades, digital currencies failed because they required a trusted third party—like a bank—to verify transactions. Bitcoin eliminated that need. By using something known as "Proof of Work", Bitcoin solved the Byzantine Generals Problem for the first time in history, allowing a global network of strangers to agree on a single source of truth—without needing trust. What is this Proof of Work. More on that tomorrow, when we answer the big question: How does Bitcoin solve the Byzantine Generals Problem? See ya then! 📌 Side Note: This is part of “Understanding Bitcoin: A 21-Day Journey.” After 21 days, you’ll know more than 99% of people about how Bitcoin truly works.