Harga MoveAppMOVE

Toma is worthless , an absolutely black hole. if you still have this token, its advisable you cut losses and move on before liquidity dries up.

Last night, I tuned into a space that was joined by @tomkysar from @gasdotzip, @futurenomics from @mach_exchange, @0xLamps from @StargateFinance, and @arjunnchand from Today, various models are often referred to as Bridges. From those using liquidity pools to intent-based models that leverage Solvers and even those leveraging MMs or CEXs, bridges have evolved tremendously since they were first introduced. To add some context, I do not work on bridge projects and am not overly technical. All the information below is based on my understanding of and thoughts on the direction of the bridging or interop space in the foreseeable future. What is bridging? Bridging was initially used to describe the movement of tokens from one chain to another. Over time, it expanded to include data transfers. The word bridge was used to make it easier for users to understand the concept, which was, in the beginning, often slow and cumbersome. What is bridging today? Today, various models are often referred to as Bridges. Since they were first introduced, bridges have evolved tremendously, from those using liquidity pools to intent-based models of today that leverage Solvers and even those leveraging MMs or CEXs. If you've been around and following bridges long enough, you'd probably remember the image above from 2021. Now, consider how you use Bridges today. It would be apparent how much the above has evolved in a few short years. The players listed in @DefiLlama are very different today than three short years ago. Some have shut down, while others have faded away. This brings me to what I think will happen to bridges and interop protocols over time. 1. Fees will trend to ZERO It's probably not what the protocols building in this segment want to hear. 😅 But in my opinion, bridge fees will go even lower over time, and those without sufficient volume will fade into irrelevance. Fee models would probably work in specific offerings and generate 80% of the protocol revenue compared to the more generalized service catered to a broader audience. 2. Bridge frontends will be made obsolete Today, most bridges or aggregators offer a dApp frontend for users to initiate a bridging or cross-chain swap transaction. This will disappear as interoperability and bridging functionalities become more natively integrated within dApps. Over time, it will become unnecessary for bridges, and interop protocols will no longer need to operate and maintain their own frontend as these functionalities move to the backend, which has now become an accepted and integral use between different chains. 3. Oracles and ZK I think oracles and ZK coprocessors might play a more significant role in interoperability. I have seen projects such as @union_build, @lagrangedev, @HerodotusDev, and @brevis_zk explore possible applications of zk Coprocessors for bridging; however, it is unclear at the moment what improvements this will bring to the overall bridging and interoperability space. There is still much to be done before we can eliminate the term bridging and refer to any transaction as a transfer or swap, regardless of whether they are on a single chain or multiple chains. Chain Abstraction protocols such as @SOCKETProtocol, @ParticleNtwrk, and @biconomy give us a glimpse into what the future holds and the improvements it brings to the user experience are promising. But are we close to achieving that yet? I don't think we are. Improvements have been made since 2021, but they are nowhere near what is needed for wider adoption. As I said in the beginning, this is how I view the bridging and interop space today. While I know many would probably disagree with my opinions or have a different point of view, please comment below. I'd love to hear from you.

$BTC SEC Files Suit Against Elon Musk Over Twitter Stock Purchase The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has initiated legal proceedings against Elon Musk, alleging breaches of securities laws. The lawsuit has been lodged in a Washington federal court, centering on Musk's acquisition of Twitter shares. What We Currently Know Although the exact accusations remain ambiguous, legal documents confirm that the case revolves around Musk’s purchase of Twitter stock. The claims could pertain to possible breaches of disclosure obligations or market manipulation. Importance of the Case Musk, who has previously faced SEC scrutiny, might face substantial legal consequences. Given his track record of controversial tweets and stock transactions, the spotlight is now on Twitter (now X) amidst this latest legal challenge. Your Perspective? Is this legal action a calculated move against Musk, or do the allegations hold legitimate weight? #MuskLawsuit #SECCase

As the crypto market rallies, Sonic Coin is quietly building momentum, setting the stage for a potential massive breakout. Key Highlights: 1. _Bullish Volume Patterns_: Steady volume indicates a positive outlook. 2. _Stable Market Sentiment_: Sonic Coin's stability during market rallies suggests focused buying. 3. _Breakout Potential_: Prolonged accumulation often precedes a strong breakout. Why Sonic Coin? With its unique features and growing community on Bitget, Sonic Coin is well-positioned to capitalize on market momentum. Stay Alert! Keep Sonic Coin on your radar to catch the next big move! #SonicCoin #CryptoMarket #Altcoins #Breakout #AccumulationPhase $CATGOLD

Intesa Sanpaolo, Italy's largest banking group, has made its first direct investment in Bitcoin, purchasing 11 BTC for approximately €1 million. This move marks a significant milestone, as Intesa Sanpaolo becomes the first Italian bank to directly invest in the leading cryptocurrency. The bank's foray into digital assets began in 2023 with the establishment of a proprietary trading desk for cryptocurrencies. In 2024, it expanded its operations to include spot trading of digital currencies. The recent Bitcoin purchase aligns with a period of significant growth for the cryptocurrency, which more than doubled in value in 2024. This surge was driven by factors such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of exchange-traded funds tied to Bitcoin's spot price and optimism over regulatory developments under incoming U.S. President Donald Trump. Analysts speculate that Bitcoin could surpass the $100,000 mark, with some expecting its value to more than double by the end of 2025. Intesa Sanpaolo's investment reflects a broader trend of traditional financial institutions embracing digital assets. In July 2024, the bank underwrote Italy's first blockchain-based digital bond, a €25 million issuance on the Polygon network, demonstrating its commitment to blockchain innovation. This strategic move by Intesa Sanpaolo may encourage other Italian financial institutions to explore opportunities in the digital asset space, signaling a shift towards greater acceptance and integration of cryptocurrencies within the traditional banking sector. $BTC