Cena cVault.financeCORE

🇺🇸 FED: The Fed will release the US core PCE price index for February this week. The market forecasts it to rebound from 2.6% to 2.8%. What’s your prediction? 👇

guys Pi market is strange... Too yound and will take yea or 2 to get real utility at this point price is based on mood and speculation. Great time to make cash or lose cash be smart. Pi pros: Good protocol big audience new apps developed core team babysitting the network energy friendly quite good start Cons: Not much of usage mood swings not fully decentalised kind of semi piloted no big moves are made a lot of coins daily releases My view of Pi: most probably will go out of current ranges set, breaking the low and up points at some point this year. Many moves between support and res zones breaking 1 or 2 most of the time... Agressive strategy can make huge profit or loss... I personally have chosen more defensive strategy for pi with low but more secure profit

$PI pi is s big lie pi team is not migrating the pi coins to wallet these 6.73 B coins mostly have a core team they are selling and small clients are purchasing . pi is a waste of time and money.

The United States is on the verge of making a groundbreaking shift in digital asset policy. The BITCOIN Act of 2025 (S.954), introduced in the 119th Congress (2025–2026), proposes the establishment of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve —a first-of-its-kind national strategy for accumulating Bitcoin . With strong bipartisan support and momentum building, this act could reshape the role of Bitcoin in national economic and geopolitical strategy . According to recent data from Stand With Crypto, the bill has gained substantial traction: ✅ 61% of U.S. Senators (61 out of 100) support the legislation. ✅ 65% of the House of Representatives (285 out of 435) are in favor. ✅ The President has officially expressed support, further solidifying the bill’s viability. With this level of cross-party consensus, the BITCOIN Act of 2025 is one of the most widely supported crypto initiatives in U.S. history. At the core of the bill is a Key Proposal: The U.S. government will purchase 1 million Bitcoin over five years and hold it for 20 years. This initiative would establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, mirroring the logic behind the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve but applied to digital assets. The aim is to position Bitcoin as a long-term store of value and national economic hedge, especially in the face of rising global inflation and fiat currency devaluation. If enacted, this bill could lead to one of the largest Bitcoin accumulation events in history, possibly triggering a domino effect among other nations . The idea of nation-state accumulation is central to what's known as Bitcoin game theory —once one major country starts stockpiling BTC, others are incentivized to follow to avoid being left behind. This could: With the U.S. leading the charge, this move could pressure other global economies to react swiftly. The formation of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve would make Bitcoin a geopolitical asset , not just a speculative investment. Countries that are slow to adapt could face strategic disadvantages in wealth preservation, monetary policy, and economic independence. Meanwhile, nations that follow suit may benefit from early-stage accumulation and increased global influence. The BITCOIN Act of 2025 is more than a bill—it's a declaration. A declaration that Bitcoin is no longer just a fringe asset but a strategic reserve capable of shaping the future of finance and geopolitics. As bipartisan support builds and the proposal inches closer to becoming law, investors and institutions are watching closely. Are you ready for what comes next in the Bitcoin revolution ?

On March 20, 2025, Elon Musk spoke live from Austin to try to contain the storm shaking Tesla. As the stock collapses on the stock market and criticisms intensify, the CEO played the card of appeasement and loyalty, betting on an offensive speech to preserve internal cohesion and reassure about the group’s future. During an internal broadcast from the Gigafactory in Austin, Elon Musk directly addressed his troops in an effort to re-mobilize them. He urged employees to hold onto their Tesla shares despite the marked decline in the stock price. Additionally, he stated: If you believe in the future of the company, I think it would be wise to hold onto your shares. In the face of a loss of more than 40% of the stock value over the last three months, this message aims to counter a possible internal panic and to establish a long-term dynamic. Musk acknowledged that “we are going through a difficult time“, and reaffirmed his optimistic vision for Tesla. He also took the time to denounce attacks that targeted the company’s infrastructure. Several Tesla concessions have reportedly been vandalized, a situation that Musk links to political tensions. He specified that “if people don’t want to buy our cars, that’s their right. But destroying our property should not be tolerated.” This speech is part of a corporate culture centered on shareholder loyalty. Several indicators underscore the seriousness of the situation: This speech, aimed at employees but also indirectly at the markets and public opinion, fits into a strategy of internal consolidation at a pivotal moment for the company. Beyond the call for restraint, Musk seized the opportunity to remind of Tesla’s technological ambitions. He highlighted progress in autonomous driving and emphasized that the Model Y, the brand’s flagship product, remains in his view the car “the most sold in the world.” In this logic of the future, Tesla’s CEO revealed that new, more affordable models should be launched “in the first half of the year“. These announcements are part of a broader strategy to regain the trust of both investors and consumers. The displayed desire to democratize access to electric vehicles with new, more accessible ranges shows an offensive orientation. This change in direction could reposition Tesla in a more global market as competition intensifies. Musk, by defending this new dynamic, seeks to maintain the innovation momentum that has long constituted the core of Tesla’s identity. Behind the enthusiasm, however, many questions arise concerning the technological, economic, and regulatory viability of these projects. The promise of a rapid transition to an automated future still seems fragile, especially given the numerous past delays. If Tesla manages to realize these ambitions, it could regain the upper hand. Otherwise, these announcements risk being seen as a diversion in the face of current challenges. It remains to be seen if the markets, employees, and customers will still share this faith in Musk’s narrative.