Sign PriceSIGN

📊 #Bitcoin is confidently trading above its Realized Price in April 2025 — a classic sign of a healthy bull market. MVRV > 1 means most holders are in profit. No signs of overheating yet. Still room to run. Stay sharp. 🚀 #Token2049Dubai

However, there is no official word from NVIDIA about making such a move. The last financial reports and SEC filings by the company show no sign of Bitcoin holdings. It’s worth noting that other businesses, including MicroStrategy (MSTR) and Tesla (TSLA), have in the past put Bitcoin on their balance sheets. As of April 2025, companies that have Bitcoin on their balance sheets collectively own more than 630,000 BTC, representing over 3% of the circulating supply of Bitcoin.If NVIDIA were to formally embrace Bitcoin, it may be able to surpass MicroStrategy, whose stock price has climbed almost 3,142% since it put the Bitcoin Standard into place back in August 2020. Currently, NVDA stock falls short of the MSTR stock’s performance with 916% returns reported in the same period. Additionally, Yat Siu at TOKEN2049 pointed to whether businesses acquiring Bitcoin are actually believers or are simply trend-followers. This relates to speculation that NVIDIA is putting Bitcoin on its balance sheet, leaving one wondering if it is a strategic option or merely trendy

$INIT is trading at $0.76354, down by 0.64% in the latest 15-minute window. While the movement may not seem steep at first glance, the overall technical setup is flashing caution for both new entrants and current holders. The token has been fluctuating between $0.83162 and $0.71324 in the last 24 hours, showing wide volatility and a struggle for market direction. Recent price action on the 15-minute chart shows a clear sequence of lower highs and lower lows, a textbook definition of a downtrend. The last few candlesticks indicate strong bearish momentum, with the price now testing near-term support around $0.759. The moving average indicators suggest continuation of the short-term bearish trend. The 5-period MA is currently at $0.78088, the 10-period MA at $0.78582, and the 20-period MA at $0.79895. All three are sloping downward, and the price is well below each, showing no sign of immediate recovery. Average buy and sell prices are tightly packed at $0.77082 and $0.76679 respectively, suggesting a lack of strong conviction from either side. Volume has thinned out compared to earlier in the day. Lower trading activity during a price decline often indicates a lack of demand, which is not a positive sign for buyers hoping for a bounce. For buyers: Entering now carries risk. Look for a breakout above the 5-period MA near $0.78 with confirmation from volume before considering a long position. Any upward move without significant volume is likely to be a bull trap. For sellers: The trend favors you. Short positions remain valid as long as price stays below $0.78. Stop-losses can be placed just above this level, with profit targets in the $0.74–$0.71 range. Conclusion: Momentum is with the bears in the short term. Without a shift in volume or reversal signals, the market sentiment leans negative. Stay vigilant and wait for trend confirmation before committing capital. $INIT

Is $HAEDAL’s Market Cap Undervalued or Fairly Priced? As of May 1, 2025, $HAEDAL, the native token of the Haedal Protocol built on the Sui blockchain, is trading at approximately $0.12 with a market capitalization of around $23.6 million. To determine whether $HAEDAL is undervalued or fairly priced, we need to assess it across several key factors: its utility, tokenomics, ecosystem integration, and broader market positioning. Utility and Ecosystem Role Haedal Protocol provides a liquid staking solution for Sui, allowing users to stake SUI tokens and receive haSUI in return—unlocking liquidity while still earning staking rewards. In a market increasingly driven by composable DeFi products, protocols like Haedal serve a crucial function. By enabling staked assets to remain usable in DeFi, it supports capital efficiency—something institutional and retail investors alike value. With Sui gaining traction as a scalable Layer 1, Haedal is positioned to ride that momentum. Tokenomics and Supply Risk HAEDAL has a circulating supply of 195 million tokens out of a maximum supply of 1 billion, placing the fully diluted valuation (FDV) at around $121 million. This means over 80% of the token supply is yet to enter circulation. While the current market cap appears modest, the potential future inflation from token unlocks must be accounted for. If these are well-managed (via vesting schedules, utility growth, and strategic incentives), the current valuation may still be conservative. However, without transparency on emission schedules, that risk could lead to dilution over time. Market Activity and Liquidity Signals One standout metric is $HAEDAL’s 24-hour trading volume, recently clocking in at approximately $144 million—more than six times its market cap. That level of volume relative to market cap is unusually high, pointing to strong speculative interest and potentially aggressive accumulation. While this can be a sign of early undervaluation, it can also imply short-term volatility and hype-driven spikes. Either way, it’s a signal that the market is paying attention. Comparative Valuation When compared to similar liquid staking protocols on other chains (such as Lido on Ethereum or Marinade on Solana), $HAEDAL’s market cap appears significantly smaller. Lido, for example, grew its cap by capturing a meaningful portion of ETH staking volume. If Haedal achieves even a fraction of this within the Sui ecosystem, its upside could be substantial. Given Sui’s rising developer activity and TVL growth, this scenario isn't far-fetched. Final Verdict At under $25 million in market cap, $HAEDAL appears undervalued, but conditionally so. The valuation reflects early-stage risk, but also early-stage opportunity. Key factors that will determine whether this discount persists include how effectively the team grows adoption, handles token unlocks, and maintains development pace. For now, given its role in a growing ecosystem and strong trading activity, the market cap seems to be lagging behind its potential.

Trust in $HAEDAL's team depends on transparency, experience, execution, and community communication. Here's an analysis to help answer whether holding through volatility is justified: 1. Project Background and Innovation: Haedal Protocol is building liquid staking infrastructure on the Sui blockchain. This positions it in a high-potential niche, as liquid staking is a major DeFi trend. If the team is pushing technical innovation and aligning with Sui’s growth, that’s a strong base. 2. Team Transparency: If the team has doxxed founders or has public profiles with relevant blockchain experience (e.g., prior work in DeFi, staking infrastructure, or with layer-1s like Sui), that adds significant credibility. Undoxxed teams are not necessarily untrustworthy, but they do carry more risk, especially in volatile markets. 3. Execution and Communication: Teams that consistently hit roadmap milestones, communicate clearly during dips, and offer transparency on token emissions and treasury use earn greater investor trust. If $HAEDAL’s team has been active on platforms like X, Discord, or Medium with clear updates and AMAs, that’s a green flag. 4. Ecosystem Integration: If the team is working closely with the Sui ecosystem, participating in partnerships, hackathons, or ecosystem grants, it signals real development rather than hype. Deep integration implies a commitment to long-term utility and adoption. 5. Handling Volatility: Teams that remain visible and engaged during market downturns (rather than going quiet) build trust. If the $HAEDAL team continues improving the protocol and providing value even when price action is negative, that’s a sign they’re building for the long term. If you're holding $HAEDAL and the team shows these characteristics, it may be worth riding out volatility. Would you like a breakdown of the team's public info, GitHub commits, or roadmap progress to evaluate this more specifically?