Prezzo di SkycoinSKY

$BUZZ will fly to the Sky 🐝

$ZOO low investment double profit sky rocket sky rocket 🚀 🚀 🚀 🤣, 🚀, 🚀,🤣, 🤣😂

Bitcoin $BTC has hit a remarkable milestone. With a market capitalization of $1.7 trillion, it now accounts for 1.3% of the global money supply. For a decentralized digital asset that started as an experiment just over 15 years ago, this is a staggering achievement and a clear signal that we’re still in the early innings of its potential. The Numbers Tell the Story The global money supply, encompassing cash, bank deposits, and other liquid instruments (often measured as M2), is estimated to hover around $130 trillion. Bitcoin’s $1.7 trillion market cap might seem like a drop in the bucket by comparison, but that’s exactly why the bullish case is so compelling. At just 1.3%, Bitcoin has already outpaced the market value of many national currencies and established itself as a legitimate player in the financial world all without a central bank, government backing, or physical form. Consider this: if Bitcoin were a country, its "economy" would rank among the top 20 globally by GDP. Yet, unlike traditional economies, Bitcoin’s growth isn’t constrained by geography, politics, or resource scarcity. Its fixed supply of 21 million coins and decentralized nature make it a unique asset, one that’s increasingly catching the eye of investors, institutions, and even skeptics turning into believers. Why This Matters Reaching 1.3% of global money isn’t just a fun statistic it’s a testament to Bitcoin’s staying power and adoption. The asset has weathered brutal bear markets, regulatory uncertainty, and endless FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) to emerge stronger each cycle. This resilience is drawing in a wave of new participants, from retail hodlers to Wall Street giants. Institutional adoption is accelerating. Companies like MicroStrategy have made Bitcoin a core treasury asset, while ETFs in the U.S. and beyond have opened the floodgates for traditional investors. Meanwhile, nations like El Salvador have embraced it as legal tender, and others are quietly exploring similar moves. The network effect is kicking in: the more people use Bitcoin, the more valuable and entrenched it becomes. We’re Still Early Really Early If 1.3% sounds impressive, here’s the kicker: there’s still so much room to grow. Imagine Bitcoin capturing 5% of global money supply that’s a $6.5 trillion market cap at current estimates. Push it to 10%, and we’re talking $13 trillion, nearly rivaling gold’s total market value. These aren’t pie-in-the-sky projections; they’re plausible scenarios given Bitcoin’s trajectory and the cracks forming in traditional financial systems. Inflation, currency devaluation, and distrust in centralized institutions are tailwinds propelling Bitcoin forward. Fiat currencies are losing purchasing power look at the U.S. dollar’s 20%+ decline in real value over the past decade. Bitcoin, with its capped supply, offers a hedge that’s hard to ignore. And with only about 5-10% of the world’s population owning crypto, according to most estimates, the adoption curve is barely starting to steepen. The Bullish Case in One Word: Scarcity Bitcoin’s killer feature is its scarcity. Only 21 million BTC will ever exist, and with millions already lost to forgotten wallets or hodlers who won’t sell, the effective circulating supply is even smaller. Compare that to fiat, where central banks can print trillions at will (see: $6 trillion in COVID era stimulus). As demand rises and it is rising Bitcoin’s price could see exponential gains. At $1.7 trillion, Bitcoin is no longer a niche experiment; it’s a global force. Yet, at 1.3% of the money supply, it’s nowhere near saturation. The next decade could see it challenge gold, bonds, or even equities as a store of value. Early adopters aren’t just sitting on gains they’re positioned for a paradigm shift.

tech ain't a moat! Seriously, I keep seeing these projects strutting their stuff, bragging about how their tech is going to revolutionize everything, the "next big thing since sliced bread." reality check: NO ONE CARES And I mean that in the nicest way possible. The sooner project teams realize that whatever "cool shit" they’re building isn’t automatically a user magnet, the better off they'll be. Sure, your tech might solve some complex technical problems, but is it a big enough pain point for users? If your solution isn't a massive leap forward, something that genuinely blows ppls minds, they won't care. And frankly, neither would I. caveat: ONLY APPLIES IF RELIANCE IS ON USERS not all projects are created equal. some are purely technical plays, B2B focused. for them, engaging with end-users is irrelevant so they don't care. for projects that do need users, users are your path to a moat that can fend off competition. they’re what allows you to continue developing your tech for years to come. so aligning your plans and incentives with your community is critical. not so hot take: SO MANY TOKENOMIC FUCK UPS it happens all the time; projects teasing airdrops and running campaigns to attract users end up attracting the wrong kind of crowd. starknet, scroll, zksync, blast all learned this the hard way. zetachain and linea tried farming engagement over and over, only to see interest wane. ppl aren’t stupid; they know when they’re being played. airdrop farmers might stick around but even they will disappear post-tge. did you know that blast, starknet, zksync, scroll all rank below pulsechain on defillama? 🤦‍♂️ If you want to build and grow a real community, you need to align the users who already support you and those who are on the fence. Mass airdrop campaigns simply don’t cut it anymore, as we’ve seen with engagement numbers falling from the sky post-tge. hot take: THE TOKEN IS YOUR MAIN PRODUCT a project’s token is the embodiment for alignment and should be considered the project’s primary product in the beginning. it’s the path to nurturing a community and building a sustainable moat. and you don’t just give something valuable away to anyone. only users who are truly aligned with the project should be repeatedly motivated to remain engaged and have a reason to hodl. projects often confuse alignment with tvl, which can turn some users off. it’s like that date who only calls you when they want you to pay; eventually, you’ll end up feeling used. it's good to take a psychological pov on plans and activities designed to repeatedly motivate users. crypto can be a rough ride afterall. if you’re not consistently aligning your actions with your community’s needs, expect a ghost town post-tge and a token that's moving fast to zero. anyway, weekend rant over.

$BUBB sky roket