category.detail.header_title
category.detail.header_tips2
Layer 2 is a secondary protocol built on top of a primary blockchain network, such as Ethereum. This innovative solution aims to address scalability, speed, and cost limitations that often plague layer 1 networks. By enabling off-chain transactions and smart contract execution, Layer 2 protocols leverage cryptographic techniques like state channels, sidechains, and plasma chains to achieve faster and more cost-efficient transactions, thereby reducing network congestion and lowering gas fees. This layered approach enhances the overall user experience, promoting widespread adoption of decentralized applications while maintaining the fundamental security and trustlessness of the underlying blockchain.
category.detail.seemore
list_table_name | list_table_price | list_table_24h_rise | list_table_7d_rise | list_table_marketcap | list_table_volume | list_table_supply | list_table_last_24 | list_table_operation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ArbitrumARB | $0.5300 | -- | -- | $0 | $0 | 0.00 | list_table_trade | ||
OptimismOP | $1.61 | -- | -- | $0 | $0 | 0.00 | list_table_trade | ||
MantleMNT | $0.5857 | -2.59% | -1.32% | $1.97B | $73.19M | 3.37B | |||
ImmutableIMX | $1.17 | -13.71% | -18.24% | $1.92B | $64.06M | 1.64B | list_table_trade | ||
PolygonMATIC | $0.3188 | -3.09% | -8.70% | $834.11M | $7.59M | 2.62B | list_table_trade | ||
StarknetSTRK | $0.3695 | -- | -- | $0 | $0 | 0.00 | list_table_trade | ||
ZKsyncZK | $0.1291 | -6.61% | -4.49% | $474.36M | $48.11M | 3.67B | list_table_trade | ||
AevoAEVO | $0.3195 | -- | -- | $0 | $0 | 0.00 | list_table_trade | ||
Manta NetworkMANTA | $0.6646 | -3.44% | -7.93% | $254.83M | $27.36M | 383.46M | list_table_trade | ||
MetisMETIS | $40.97 | -- | -- | $0 | $0 | 0.00 | list_table_trade | ||
SKALESKL | $0.03430 | -5.65% | -10.12% | $189.96M | $23.73M | 5.54B | list_table_trade | ||
LoopringLRC | $0.1176 | -4.10% | -6.64% | $160.76M | $9.84M | 1.37B | list_table_trade | ||
Merlin ChainMERL | $0.2895 | -3.40% | -6.42% | $152.00M | $13.87M | 525.00M | list_table_trade | ||
LiskLSK | $0.7618 | -4.54% | -4.96% | $123.44M | $2.81M | 162.04M | list_table_trade | ||
CartesiCTSI | $0.1227 | -4.57% | -13.03% | $102.61M | $7.70M | 835.98M | list_table_trade | ||
LumiaLUMIA | $1.12 | +1.69% | -0.78% | $83.90M | $23.68M | 74.95M | list_table_trade | ||
MyriaMYRIA | $0.002099 | -7.44% | -14.38% | $50.68M | $998,615.51 | 24.14B | list_table_trade | ||
$1.99 | -5.45% | -9.09% | $46.79M | $3.04M | 23.47M | ||||
Boba NetworkBOBA | $0.1841 | -3.98% | -7.45% | $31.59M | $1.14M | 171.62M | |||
CoinwebCWEB | $0.003866 | +4.24% | +3.58% | $8.76M | $96,700.74 | 2.27B | |||
GaiminGMRX | $0.0005210 | -4.75% | -16.70% | $8.19M | $75,245.3 | 15.72B | |||
$0.2639 | -4.02% | -0.69% | $6.55M | $803,829.02 | 24.82M | ||||
$0.1009 | -13.99% | -25.39% | $6.48M | $1.59M | 64.20M | list_table_trade | |||
ZKBaseZKB | $0.02579 | +1.04% | -7.36% | $5.09M | $700,968.47 | 197.44M | list_table_trade | ||
BitrockBROCK | $0.04161 | -- | -- | $0 | $0 | 0.00 | list_table_trade | ||
$0.01813 | -1.90% | -5.01% | $1.48M | $91,961.14 | 81.67M | ||||
NordekNRK | $0.0006295 | -10.89% | -13.43% | $400,855.21 | $240,386.95 | 636.76M | |||
HYTOPIATOPIA | $0.01203 | -8.65% | -11.16% | $0 | $46,811.57 | 0.00 | |||
CYBRIACYBA | $0.0009535 | -2.13% | -4.56% | $0 | $0 | 0.00 | |||
AIA ChainAIA | $0.002886 | -4.55% | +15.53% | $0 | $125.72 | 0.00 | |||
Root ProtocolISME | $0.001901 | -6.88% | -1.14% | $0 | $9,924.05 | 0.00 | |||
Resistor AITOR | $0.{4}7844 | -90.28% | +726.05% | $0 | $125.46 | 0.00 | |||
SatoshiVMSAVM | $0.5703 | -6.43% | -10.97% | $0 | $466,645.2 | 0.00 | |||
LayerAILAI | $0.01251 | -4.44% | -8.22% | $0 | $1.80M | 0.00 | list_table_trade | ||
xDAIxDAI | $1 | +0.01% | +0.48% | $0 | $104,297.73 | 0.00 | |||
DeGateDG | $0.08537 | +0.40% | +1.04% | $0 | $11,625.34 | 0.00 | |||
MEOWMEOW | $0.01475 | -3.40% | +15.11% | $0 | $2,771.67 | 0.00 |
category.list.faq
What is Layer 2, and what is the first-ever implementation of it?
Layer 2 refers to a secondary framework or protocol built on top of Layer 1 blockchains to address scalability issues and improve transaction processing capabilities. The first-ever Layer 2 implementation is the "Lightning Network," designed for the Bitcoin blockchain. The Lightning Network enables faster and more cost-effective transactions by creating off-chain payment channels, making it a pioneering solution in the blockchain space.
Which Layer 2 blockchains are the most well-known and widely recognized?
Several Layer 2 solutions have gained significant popularity and recognition within the blockchain space. Among the most well-known are: Lightning Network, Plasma, Optimism, Arbitrum.
How do Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchains differ from each other?
Layer 1, or the Main Blockchain, forms the foundation of the blockchain network. It handles the direct validation and execution of transactions on-chain, providing crucial security and decentralization. However, its scalability is limited, which can lead to congestion during periods of high activity. Consequently, transaction confirmation times tend to be slower due to the on-chain processing required. On the other hand, Layer 2, the Secondary Framework, operates on top of Layer 1. By leveraging various techniques, Layer 2 solutions offload a substantial portion of transactions from the main chain, thereby enhancing scalability. This results in faster transaction processing and reduced fees, as many computations occur off-chain. The potential to handle a large number of transactions per second alleviates congestion on the main blockchain. However, some Layer 2 solutions may entail a degree of trust in their consensus mechanisms.
Are transaction fees generally lower on Layer 2 compared to Layer 1?
Indeed, transaction fees on Layer 2 are generally lower than those on Layer 1. Layer 2 solutions work by conducting a significant portion of transactions off-chain, which reduces the load on the main blockchain. As a result, transaction fees become more affordable and predictable, making Layer 2 an attractive option for users looking for faster and cost-efficient transactions.
What are the trade-offs associated with Layer 2 scalability solutions?
Layer 2 scalability solutions offer increased throughput and, faster transaction times, lower fees for blockchains, particularly in networks like Ethereum. However, these benefits come with certain trade-offs: - Security: Some Layer 2 solutions may not inherit the same level of security as the underlying main chain. For example, sidechains might have a different, potentially less robust, consensus mechanism than the primary chain, making them more susceptible to attacks. - Decentralization: Certain L2 solutions may introduce points of centralization. For instance, state channels rely on participants to actively monitor and challenge malicious actions, which could centralize around a few vigilant participants or hubs. - Complexity: Implementing and interacting with L2 solutions can introduce additional complexities for developers and users. This could potentially lead to bugs or vulnerabilities if not managed properly. - Liquidity Fragmentation: Assets locked in a specific L2 solution might not be readily available for use in another L2 solution or even on the main chain, leading to liquidity silos. - User Experience: Transitioning assets between Layer 1 and Layer 2, or even between different L2 solutions, might not always be straightforward, potentially complicating the user experience. - Data Availability: For some L2 solutions, especially those like rollups, ensuring that all transaction data is available and can be validated by all network participants can be challenging. - Interoperability: With multiple L2 solutions in existence, ensuring seamless operation and interaction between them can be a challenge, potentially leading to fragmented ecosystems.
What are the different types of Layer 2 scaling solutions?
- State Channels: These are off-chain channels between parties where transactions can be made instantaneously. Only the final state gets recorded on the blockchain. - Sidechains: These are separate blockchains running in parallel to the main chain. They have their own consensus mechanisms and can operate independently but can also communicate with the main chain. - Plasma: A framework for building scalable applications where only a subset of transactions are processed on the main chain. - Rollups: These solutions batch multiple transactions into a single one, and there are two main types: Optimistic Rollups and zk-Rollups.
How do Layer 2 solutions enhance security?
Layer 2 solutions often rely on the security of the underlying Layer 1 blockchain. For instance, even though transactions may happen off-chain in a state channel or on a rollup, they ultimately have to settle or be validated on the main chain. This means that while Layer 2 may introduce its own security considerations, it leverages the security and decentralization properties of the primary blockchain.
Where can I buy Layer 2 tokens?
You can easily buy Layer 2 tokens on the Bitget platform, known for its impressive asset diversity with over 500 spot trading pairs and 570 futures trading pairs.